The Modern Lawyer № 4(37)

CONTENT

 

THEORY OF STATE AND LAW  

Oksana N. Petyukova

Oksana N. Petyukova, Doctor of Law, Professor of the International and Public Law Department of the Law Faculty at Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation. E-mail: oksana55@mail.ru

Employment of the population and realization of the citizens rights to the free use of their capabilities for business and other economic activities

Abstract

Subject/Topic The article is devoted to topical issues of the population employment in the context of modern challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and the implementation of the constitutional rights of citizens to freely use their abilities for entrepreneurial and other economic activities.

Goals/objectives The aim is to study the formation of a legal policy for promoting employment of the population in a public-legal context, as well as the effective implementation of the citizens’ rights to freely use their abilities for various types of economic activity, including entrepreneurial. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of International and Russian legislation, identification of the prospects for its development.

Methodology The study used dialectical, systemic, comparative legal, statistical methods, as well as analysis and synthesis.

Conclusion. The pandemic of the new coronavirus infection has a significant impact on the labor market and on the development of Russian legislation on employment. The anti-crisis measures formulated in the National Action Plan approved by the Government of the Russian Federation on September 23, 2020 and calculated for the period until December 31, 2021, are ultimately aimed at maintaining employment and social support for the population. At the same time, the main provisions of the Law of the Russian Federation of 19.04.1991, No. 1032-1 “On employment of the population in the Russian Federation” have not changed significantly recently. There are no unified conceptual approaches to the formation of legal policy in the labor market and systemic modernization of legislation in this area. Legal mechanisms for ensuring the mobility of labor resources throughout the country with the possibility of settling people in a new place of work, providing them with housing, need to be improved. A unified digital platform for the promotion of employment and vocational retraining is also needed, taking into account various aspects of both internal and external labor migration.

Keywords: employment, legal policy, realization of rights, rights of citizens, use of abilities, entrepreneurial activity, economic activity.

References:

Entrepreneurial law: modern view: monograph [Predprinimatel’skoye pravo: sovremennyy vzglyad: monografiya] / Е.А. Abrosimova, V.K. Andreev, E.G. Afanasyev and others; otv. ed. S.A. Karelin, P.G. Lakhno, I.S. Shitkin. M .: Justicinform, 2019.

Goals in the field of sustainable development [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment /ru/sustainable-development-goals/ – the official website of the United Nations (date of access: 10.11.2021)

Abuzyarova (2018) – Abuzyarova N.A. Economic and legal regulation of the Russian labor market [Ekonomiko-pravovoye regulirovaniye rossiyskogo rynka truda] // Journal of Russian law. [Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava] 2018.N. 1.P. 128 – 137.

Brearley, Bloch (1999) – Brearley K., Bloch S. Employment Covenants and Confidential Information: Law, Practice and Technique. Butterworths. London, Dublin and Edinburgh. 1999. P. 46.

Mingaleva, Mirskikh (2010) – Mingaleva Zh., Mirskikh I. On Innovation and Knowledge Economy in Russia. In World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. Vol. 66, June 2010. P. 1033.

Lushnikov (2011) – Lushnikov A.M. Strengthening the flexibility of labor relations as a response to the challenges of the XXI century: the reasons for the introduction and the limits of implementation [Usileniye gibkosti trudovykh otnosheniy kak otvet na vyzovy XXI veka: prichiny vvedeniya i predely osushchestvleniya] // Labor market in the XXI century: in search of flexibility and protection: Mater. int. scientific. conf. May 12 – 14 [Rynok truda v XXI veke: v poiskakh gibkosti i zashchity: Mater. mezhdunar. nauch. konf. 12 – 14 maya], 2011 Vilnius, 2011.S. 120.

Kotova (2019) – Kotova S. I. Legal position of the precariat in the labor market and the concept of employment. [Pravovoye polozheniye prekariata na rynke truda i kontseptsiya zanyatosti.]- Abstract of dissertation. … .K.y.n. Moscow, 2019, p. 10.

Social protection of the family: improving of the legal regulation mechanism: monograph [Sotsial’naya zashchita sem’i: sovershenstvovaniye mekhanizma pravovogo regulirovaniya: monografiya] / V.А. Baranov, A.V. Buyanova, N.S. Volkova and others; ed. HE. Petyukova. M .: Delovoy dvor, 2015.176 p.

Machulskaya (2021) – Machulskaya E.E. COVID-19: New Challenges for People with Disabilities [COVID-19: novyye vyzovy dlya invalidov]// Social and Pension Law. [Sotsial’noye i pensionnoye pravo.] 2021. N 2.P. 20 – 26.

9
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW  

Roman B. Logvin

Roman B. Logvin, Deputy General Director for Government Relations, IVK AIR GROUP, 1 postgraduate student (Moscow State Law Academy), Moscow.

E-mail: logvin.R.B@gmail.com

Optimization of the functions of federal executive bodies

Abstract

Subject /Topic This article examines certain structural and functional aspects of the organization and activities of federal executive bodies. In particular, the interrelation of the supporting functions and the structure of the federal executive bodies is investigated, the possibility of optimizing the structure of the federal executive bodies by centralizing the supporting functions and the establishment of a single personnel agency is analyzed.

Goals / objectives The purpose of this work is to develop theoretical proposals for optimizing the structure of federal executive bodies by centralizing the supporting functions of these bodies and the establishment of a Unified Personnel Agency.

Methodology The methodological basis of the work is the structural-functional and systemic research methods, the use of which allows us to consider federal executive bodies as a complex developing system, to trace the structural links between various elements of the system, and also to formulate theoretical proposals for optimizing the functions of these bodies.

Conclusion The staffing of personnel and other support units is striking in its scale even now, when the last administrative reform has actually been completed, as a result of which the maximum number of civil servants in the support units of the central offices of the federal executive authorities was officially fixed. Thus, it can be stated that the establishment of a Unified Personnel Agency can significantly optimize the modern state apparatus of the Russian Federation.

Keywords: executive power, system and structure of federal executive bodies, functions of federal executive bodies, state administration. 

References:

Tikhomirov (2013) – Tikhomirov Y.A. State: monograph [Gosudarstvo : monografiya] // Norm [Norma] 2013.

Rossinsky (2019) – Rossinsky B.V. Implementation of the concepts of administrative reform [Realizaciya koncepcij administrativnoj reformy] // Bulletin of the University named after O.E. Kutafina (Moscow State Law Academy) [Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYUA)] 2019. № 1. S. 31-38.

Rossinsky (2004) – Rossinsky B.V. On the issue of reforming the system of federal executive bodies [K voprosu o reformirovanii sistemy federal’nyh organov ispolnitel’noj vlasti] // Administrative law and process [Administrativnoe pravo i process] 2004. № 1.

Belsky (1997) – Belsky K.S. On the functions of the executive power [O funkciyah ispolnitel’noj vlasti] // State and law [Gosudarstvo i pravo] 1997. № 3. S. 14 – 21.

Petrov (2012) – Petrov M.P. Issues of improving the structure of federal executive bodies [Voprosy sovershenstvovaniya struktury federal’nyh organov ispolnitel’noj vlasti] // SGAP Bulletin [Vestnik SGAP] 2012. № 1. P. 74-80.

Arzhanukhin (2012) – Arzhanukhin S.V. Organizational pathologies of personnel reserve management in the civil service [Organizacionnye patologii upravleniya kadrovym rezervom na gosudarstvennoj grazhdanskoj sluzhbe] // Management issues [Voprosy upravleniya] 2012. № 1. P. 86-94.

Officials and civil servants (2020) – Officials and civil servants [Chinovniki i gosudarstvennye sluzhashchie] // Dominant [Dominanty] 2020. № 48.  P. 13-24.

21

Dmitry M. Matyushenkov

Dmitry M. Matyushenkov, Chairman of the Youth Chamber at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union of Belarus and Russia; Postgraduate student of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)”, Moscow.

E-mail: mdm95@yandex.ru.

On the status of young scientists in the Russian Federation

Abstract

Subject / Topic Aspects of the legal status of young scientists in the Russian Federation are considered, taking into account the adopted Federal Law of December 30 2020 “On Youth Policy in the Russian Federation”, regional legislation and foreign experience in this field are analyzed, a comparative study of some aspects of this problem is carried out.

Goals / Objectives Determination of the current legal status of young scientists in the Russian Federation, taking into account the adopted Federal Law of December 30 2020 “On Youth Policy in the Russian Federation”. The study of the regulatory framework of the subjects of the Russian Federation and foreign experience, to conduct a comparative analysis and highlight common laws, in order to form proposals for improving legal regulation.

Methodology Methods of analysis, synthesis, descriptions, comparisons, historical method, method of comparative jurisprudence, methods of formal logic were used.

Conclusion and Relevance Despite the adoption of the Federal Law of December 30 2020 “On Youth Policy in the Russian Federation”, the legislation of the subjects of the Russian Federation still lacks a unified approach to determining the status of young scientists. It is necessary to consolidate a single concept at the level of federal law, which will allow to harmonize the development of natural science and improve the quality of personnel training.

Keywords: science, education, scientists, young scientists, youth. 

References:

Gutnikov (2007) – Gutnikov O.V. The legal status of young scientists and research workers who retired // Journal of Russian Law [Pravovoy status molodyih uchenyih i nauchnyih rabotnikov, vyishedshih na pensiyu // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava], 2007, No 7. (ATP Consultant Plus).

Mehrishvili, Skrauch (2012) – Mehrishvili L.L., Skrauch O.N. Young scientists as a social group: on the issue of motivation of scientific activity and vocational guidance // Specificity of pedagogical education in the regions of Russia [Molodyie uchenyie kak sotsialnaya gruppa: k voprosu motivatsii nauchnoy deyatelnosti i professionalnoy orientatsii // Spetsifika pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya v regionah Rossii], 2012, № 1. P. 152-163.

Shamsutdinova, Yagafarova, Isyangulova (2016) – Shamsutdinova N.K., Yagafarova D.G., Isyangulova E.I. Young scientists in the system of the scientific community // Collection of scientific articles of the Institute of Social Research, INGGU. – Magas: Ingush State University [Sbornik nauchnyih statey instituta sotsialnyih issledovaniy INGGU. – Magas: Ingushskiy gosuniversitet], 2016. P. 227-230.

Teslenko (2017) – Teslenko A.N. Young scientist in Kazakhstan: features of social and professional status / / Gaudeamus, 2017

Matyushenkov D. M. Stepanenko (2019) – Matyushenkov D.M. Stepanenko Yu. V. On the legal status of young scientists/ international scientific journal “Modern Lawyer” No. 3 (28) 2019. 19-28.

29

Arpine A. Manukyan

Arpine A. Manukyan, Department of Administrative Law and Process, Master’s Student at Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL).

E-mail: iammanukyan13@gmail.com

Academic advisor: Yury V. Stepanenko, Professor, Doctor of Law, Professor of the Department of Administrative Law and Process of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation.

Е-mail: stepanenko.50@mail.ru

Administrative justice as a way of ensuring legality in public administration

Abstract

Subject / Topic The problems of improving the quality of public administration and enhancing the legitimacy in public administration.

Goals / Objectives This study aims to develop ways of optimizing judicial control over public administration and improving the institution of appeal.

Methodology The methods of analysis, synthesis, generalization, historical, comparative legal method were used.

Conclusion and Relevance One of the mechanisms for resolving these problems is strengthening judicial control over the public authorities and their officials and improving the institution of appeals by establishing specialized administrative courts in the Russian Federation.

Keywords: public administration, ensuring legality, administrative justice, judiciary control, appeal, administrative courts.

References:

Arapov (2015) – Arapov N.A. The principle of maintaining confidence of the citizens’ in the law and actions of the state in Russian constitutional law and justice [Princip podderzhaniya doveriya grazhdan k zakonu i dejstviyam gosudarstva v rossijskom konstitucionnom prave i pravosudii]. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. SPB. P.4.

Salisheva (2017) – Salisheva N.G., New Legislation of the Judicial Review of the Legality of Executive Actions [Salishcheva N.G. O sudebnom kontrole za zakonnost’yu v deyatel’nosti organov ispolnitel’noj vlasti]. 2017 (6) Administrative Law and Process, P.80.

Studenikina (1996) – Studenikina M.S. Administrative justice: which path to choose in Russia? [Administrativnaya yustitsiya: kakoi put’ izbrat’ v Rossii?] // Russian Justice [Rossiiskaya yustitsiya]. 1996. # 5. S. 35.

Zelentsov (2015) – Zelentsov A. B., Forms of administrative justice in modern world and features of administrative justice organization in Russia [Modeli administrativnoj yusticii v sovremennom mire i osobennosti ee organizacii v Rossii]. 2015 (8) Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), P.39.

Zagryackov (1925) – Zagryackov M.D. Administrative Justice and the Right of Complaint in Theory and Legislation. [Administrativnaya yusticiya i pravo zhaloby v teorii i zakonodatelstve]. Moscow: Law and Life, 1925. P. 240.

Soloviova (1998) – Soloviova A.K. The conception of the administrative justice: the material aspect [Koncepciya administrativnoj yusticii: material’no-pravovoj aspekt]. 1998 (4), Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Jurisprudence [Pravovedenie], P. 54.

Boitsova, Boitsov (1994) – Boitsova V.V., Boitsov V.YA. Administrative justice: to continue the discussion about the content and meaning [Administrativnaya yustitsiya: k prodolzheniyu diskussii o soderzhanii i znachenii]. // State and Law [Gosudarstvo i pravo]. 1994. # 5. S.43.

Korkunov (1899) – Korkunov N.M. Russian state law [Russkoe gosudarstvennoe pravo]. SPb., 1899. S. 497 – 498.

Starilow (2015) – Starilow Ju.N., The Code of administrative judicial proceeding of the Russian Federation: significance for judicial-administrative practice and problems of organization of teaching the educational course [Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossijskoj Federacii: znachenie dlya sudebnoj i administrativnoj praktiki i problemy organizacii prepodavaniya uchebnogo kursa]. 2015 (7) Administrative Law and Process [Administrativnoe pravo i process] PP.9-10

Khamaneva (2009) – Khamaneva N.YU. Administrative justice and administrative-legal relations: theoretical problems [Administrativnaya yustitsiya i administrativno-pravovye otnosheniya: teoreticheskie problemy]. // Proceedings of the INP RAS [Trudy INP RAN]. 2009. # 1. S. 49.

Lebedev (2000) – Lebedev V. From the idea of judicial regulation to administrative proceedings [Ot idei sudebnogo normokontrolya k administrativnomu sudoproizvodstvu] // Russian Justice [Rossijskaya yusticiya]. 2000. № 9. S. 2.

Sapozhnikov (2008) – Sapozhnikov A.I. On the issue of creating administrative justice in the Russian Federation [K voprosu o sozdanii administrativnoi yustitsii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii].// Advocate practice [Advokatskaya praktika] 2008. # 1. S.42.

Tikhomirov (2001) – Tikhomirov YU. A. Administrative law and process [Administrativnoe pravo i protsess] / YU. A. Tikhomirov. – M.: Yurinformtsentr, 2001. S. 411.

Bakhrakh (2003) – Bakhrakh D.N., There Is a Need for Judges’, Not Courts’ Specialization [Nuzhna specializaciya ne sudov, a sudej]. 2003(2) Russian Justice [Rossijskaya yusticiya], P.10.

37
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW  

Sergey I. Girko

Sergey I. Girko, Doctor of Law, professor, chief research fellow at Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Research Institute.

E-mail: syvorina959134@mail.ru

A vicious circle of problems around penitentiary crime

Abstract

Subject/Topic A vicious circle of problems around penitentiary crime.

Goals/Tasks Based on the analysis of the main problems related to the phenomenon of crime in the penal enforcement system, the author analyzes the state of the criminal procedural competence of the subjects of procedural legal relations-bodies and institutions that execute sentences in the form of deprivation of liberty and those sentenced to forced labor and held in correctional centers, comes to the conclusion that it does not correspond to the tasks of countering penitentiary crime. Based on the analysis of data on the crime of persons sentenced to imprisonment and held in correctional institutions of the penal enforcement system, personnel of institutions and bodies of the penal enforcement system, persons who found themselves in the location of a correctional institution for various reasons and other subjects contained in the relevant departmental statistical forms, information about the joint criminal activity of convicts and staff of correctional institutions, it examines the question of whether the officially registered information about the state of penitentiary crime corresponds to its real state.

The author puts forward a hypothesis that the scientific and practical problems that have developed around the phenomenon of crime in the penitentiary system that outwardly resemble a “vicious circle” can actually be consistently solved, starting with the establishment of accurate accounting of penitentiary crimes.

Methodology Analysis, synthesis, comparison, abstraction, problem statement, hypothesis building, specification, monitoring.

Conclusion Based on the results of the analysis, the author comes to the conclusion that the consolidation and expansion of the criminal procedural competence of the subjects of the penitentiary system, the level of security of penitentiary institutions directly depend on the state of penitentiary crime and that the aggregate information on the level of crime in the penitentiary system contained in statistical forms of accounting, as well as its high degree of latency, do not allow to assess the real state of the phenomenon of penitentiary crime in Russia, and in addition, they create an obstacle to the effective solution of scientific and practical tasks aimed at countering this type of crime.

Keywords: penal enforcement system, criminal procedural competence of subjects of the penal enforcement system, criminal procedural powers, correctional institution, penitentiary crime, latency of penitentiary crimes, criminological characteristics of crime in the penal enforcement system, the state of penitentiary crime, subjects of penitentiary crimes 

Reference:

Kunitsin (2013) – Kunitsin S.N. On the procedural status of the bodies of inquiry of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. [O protsesualnom statuse organov doznsnija FSIN Rossii] Bulletin of the Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2013. No. 2.

Kunitsin (2013) – Kunitsyn S. N. Officials of the bodies of inquiry of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. [ Dolsgnostnie litsa organov doznanija FSIN Rossii] Bulletin of the Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2013. No. 3. pp. 167-174;

Kubasov (2015) – Kubasov A.V. Supervision of inquiry and other procedural activities in the penal enforcement system. [Nadzor za doznaniem I inoy processualnoy dejatelnostju v ugolovno-ispolnitelnoy sisteme] Legality. 2015. No. 7. p. 26-28;

Belyakov, Brylyakov (2016) – Belyakov A.V., Brylyakov S. P. Inquiry in the bodies and institutions of the criminal executive system of Russia. [Doznanije v organah I uchrejdenijah ugolovno-ispolnitelnoy sistemi Rossii] Bulletin of the Kuzbass Institute. No. 2 (27). April-June. 2016. pp. 110-116;

Shalagin (2016) – Shalagin A. E. Criminological characteristics and prevention of crimes committed in places of deprivation of liberty. [Kriminologicheskaja harakteristika I predupregdenije prestuplenij, sovershaemih v mestah lishenija svobodi] Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology, 2016. No. 1. pp. 216-219.

Statistical form 2-UIS. As amended by the order of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia dated 14.08.2019 No. 675.

Girko, Dolgopolov (2019) – Girko S. I., Dolgopolov A. A. Directions of development of the criminal procedural competence of the subjects of the criminal executive system of the Russian Federation. [Napravlenija razvitija ugolovno-protsessualnoj kompetentsii subjektov ugolovno-ispolnitelnoj sistemi Rossii] Proceedings of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. No. 1 (49) March, 2019. pp. 73-79;

Girko, Skudareva (2018) – Girko S. I., Skudareva N. I. Strategy of restoration of criminal procedural powers by penitentiary institutions as a modern vector of development of the penal enforcement system in the Russian Federation. [Strategija vosstanovlenija ugolovno-protcessualnih polnomochij penitentsiarnimi uchregdenijami, kak sovremennij vector razvitija ugolovno-ispolnitelnoy sistemi v Rossijskoy Federatsii] Man: crime and punishment. 2018. Vol. 26 (1-4), No. 4. pp. 390-395.

Girko (2021) – Girko S. I. The return of the criminal executive system of the Russian Federation of procedural powers: the stages and sequence of “steps”. [Vozvrashenije ugolovno-ispolnitelnoj sisteme Rossijskoj Federatsii Rossijskoj Federatsii protsessualnih polnomothij: etapnost I posledovatelnost shagov] Vedomosti UIS. 2021. # 3 (226). pp. 6-14.

Girko (2018) – Girko S. I. Ensuring the safety of persons in the location of a correctional institution and the problems of criminal procedural powers of the penal enforcement system at the pre-trial stage of legal proceedings.[Obespethenije bezopasnosti lits v raspolodgenii ispravitelnogo uchregdenija I problemi ugolovno-protsessualnih polnomothij ugolovno -ispolnitelnoy sistemi na dosudebnom etape sudoproizvodstva] Penitentiary security: national traditions and foreign experience: materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (October 11-12, 2018). – Samara : Samara Law Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, 2018. pp. 57-59.

Vaganov (2012) – Vaganov A. B. Criminological characteristics of penitentiary crime and its prevention. Author of the cand.dis. [Kriminologicheskaja characteristika penitentciarnoy prestupnosti I ejo preduprejdenije] Chelyabinsk. 2012.

Shalagin (2016) – Shalagin A. E. Criminological characteristics and prevention of crimes committed in places of deprivation of liberty.[Kriminologicheskaja charakteristica I preduprejdenije prestuplenij v mestach lishenija svobody] Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology. 2016. # 1.

Dolgova (2000) – Russian Criminological Encyclopedia [Rossijskaja Kriminologichescaja Entsiclopedija]/ Under the general editorship of A. I. Dolgova. – M., 2000.

Zherebin, Mjrozov,Merkurijev (2005) – Zherebin V. S., Morozov V. M., Merkur’ev V. V., etc. Penitentiary crime: the essence and actual problems of prevention [Penitentciarnaja prestupnost:sostojanije I actualnije problemi preduprejdenija]  Monogr. / Under the general ed. of Yu. I. Kalinin. – Vladimir, 2005.

Gromov (2020) – Gromov V. G. Penitentiary crime. [Penitentsiarnaja prestupnost] Electronic resource – https://www.sovremennoepravo.ru/m/ articles/view/%DO%9F%DO… – request from 17.11.2020

Report on the state of crime among persons held in institutions of the penitentiary system of the Russian Federation. Form 2-UIS monthly. Approved by Order of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia No. 675 of 14.08.2019 (latest version).

Gromov (2013) –  Gromov V. G. Prevention of crimes of convicts in correctional institutions.[predupregdenije prestupnosty v ispravitelnich utcrejdenijah] Bulletin of the Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2013. No. 1 (11). pp. 42-43.

Primak (2008) – Primak A. A. On some factors of latency of penitentiary crime [O necotorih factorach latentnosty penitentsiarnoj prestupnosty] //Actual problems of combating crime in the Siberian Federal District. Krasnoyarsk, 2008.

Khokhrin (2014) – Khokhrin S. A. Criminal and executive characteristics of penitentiary crime. [Ugolovno-pravovaja harakteristika penitentsiarnoy prestupnosty] Proceedings of the Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences. 2014. No. 2-2.

Information on the activities of correctional centers and sites functioning as correctional centers. Appendix No. 1 to the order of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia dated 27.09.2017 No. 974.

Statistical report work with personnel (form FSIN-7). Access from the Statistics database.

Cleaning and reforming: why the head of the Federal Penitentiary Service demolishes his deputies. Open office. 26.03.2021. – Internet resource – https://pasmi.ru/archive/305702/ – request from 26.03.2021

The Prosecutor’s Office has identified 130 cases of violations of the rights of prisoners. Internet resource –https://pravo.ru/news/205391/ – request from 09.02.2021

48
ARBITRATION PROCESS  

Anastasia Yu. Kochurina

Anastasia Yu. Kochurina, 2nd year master’s student of the Faculty of Law at Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, assistant to the bankruptcy commissioner. E-mail: akochurina@inbox.ru

Research Supervisor: Ekaterina S. Yulova, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Legal Regulation of Economic Activity Faculty of Law at Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Termination of bankruptcy in connection with insufficient property of the debtor

Annotation

Subject/Topic the positive aspects and modern problems of legal regulation of termination of bankruptcy proceedings due to insufficient funds of the debtor are considered. The main attention is paid to the problems related to the absence of legally established grounds for continuing the bankruptcy case by the court in conditions of insufficient financing, criteria and legal consequences of the temporary lack of sufficient funds from the debtor, the responsibility of the arbitration manager for failure to file a motion to terminate the proceedings. The legal positions of Russian courts and judicial statistics are analyzed.

Goals / objectives: to identify and group the problems of legal regulation of termination of bankruptcy proceedings due to insufficient funds of the debtor, to propose ways to eliminate them at the legislative level.

Methodology: dialectical, comparative-legal and system method, formal logic techniques were used.

Conclusions the termination of bankruptcy proceedings on the basis under consideration is a diminution of the legitimate rights and interests of creditors, since it prevents the use of effective instruments for replenishing the bankruptcy estate provided for by bankruptcy legislation, and also allows insolvent persons to increase accounts payable. The author presents a number of proposals to solve the problems raised, including in terms of determining the grounds, conditions and criteria for the expediency of such termination, the concept of temporary

Keywords: insolvency, bankruptcy, termination of bankruptcy proceedings, reimbursement of court costs, financing of bankruptcy proceedings, bankruptcy estate.

References:

Gribanovskaya, Shushkanov (2020) – Gribanovskaya M.S., Shushkanov P.A. Lack of sufficient funds to finance the procedures used in the bankruptcy case as one of the grounds for terminating the bankruptcy proceedings [Otsutstvie dostatochnyh sredstv na finansirovanie procedur, primenyaemyh v dele o bankrotstve, kak odno iz osnovanij prekrashcheniya proizvodstva po delu o bankrotstve] // Magistrate judge [Mirovoj sud’ya].. – 2020. – # 3 – S. 30–35.

Galkin (2015) – Galkin S.S. Termination of bankruptcy proceedings as a legal means of protecting the debtor and creditors [Prekrashchenie proizvodstva po delu o bankrotstve kak pravovoe sredstvo zashchity dolzhnika i kreditorov] // Business law [Predprinimatel’skoe pravo]. – 2015. – # 1. – S. 53-59.

Galkin (2016) – Galkin S.S. Legal status of a debtor – a legal entity in Russian bankruptcy law [Pravovoe polozhenie dolzhnika – yuridicheskogo lica v rossijskom zakonodatel’stve o bankrotstve]: Diss. … Cand. jurid. sciences. M., 2016.

Yulova (2020) – Yulova E.S. Some problems of the implementation of the principle of social justice in the legislation on bankruptcy of legal entities [Nekotorye problemy realizacii principa social’noj spravedlivosti v zakonodatel’stve o bankrotstve yuridicheskih lic]// Education and Law [Obrazovanie i pravo]. 2020. # 1.

Sarnakova (2020) –Sarnakova A.V. Ensuring the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of creditors in the event of a debtor’s bankruptcy (beginning) [Obespechenie zashchity prav i zakonnyh interesov kreditorov pri bankrotstve dolzhnika (nachalo)]// Lawyer [YUrist]. 2020. # 4.

Potikhonina (2020) – Potikhonina Zh.N. Aspects of challenging transactions on bankruptcy grounds [Aspekty osparivaniya sdelok po bankrotnym osnovaniyam]// Arbitration manager [Arbitrazhnyj upravlyayushchij]. 2020. # 5.

Pokrovsky (2017) – Pokrovsky S.S. Responsibility of controlling the debtor for bringing to bankruptcy [Otvetstvennost’ kontroliruyushchih dolzhnika lic za dovedenie do bankrotstva]: Cand. jurid. sciences. M., 2017.

63
YOUNG SCIENTIST’S TRIBUNE  

Peter N. Savenko

Peter N. Savenko, 4rd year student of the Faculty of Law at Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

E-mail: petr.savenko.2014@mail.ru

Research Supervisor: Artemy Rozhnov, Doctor of Law, Professor, Professor of the Department of Legal Regulation of Economic Activity of the Faculty of Law at Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow.

Legal analysis of the protection of workers rights in the industrial labor charter of 1913

Annotation

Subject/Topic: the article provides a legal analysis of the Industrial Labor Charter of 1913 from the standpoint of protecting workers’ rights, analyzes the labor legislation of the Russian Empire in the 1910s, examines the historical aspect of the formation of domestic labor law, identifies historical and legal patterns of development of the branch of law under consideration, characterizes the employment contract, and also determines the overall effectiveness of the Industrial Labor Charter of 1913 in the field of workers’ rights protection.

Goals/Objectives: to conduct a comparative analysis of the labor legislation of the Russian Empire and some Western countries, to determine the legal status of workers in the Russian Empire, as well as to analyze some provisions of the Charter on Industrial Labor of 1913 from the perspective of modern law.

Methodology: the methods used in this article are generalization, systematization, analysis, analogy, as well as the comparative legal method.

Conclusions: the labor legislation of the Russian Empire did not lag behind the legislation of Western countries, it was determined that the modern Labor Code is largely based on the Industrial Labor Charter of 1913, and also that from the standpoint of modern law, many norms of the law in question were extremely relevant for their period of validity.

Keywords: Industrial labor

References:

Rozhnov (2019) – Rozhnov A.A. History of the state and law of Russia in the first half of the XIX century: textbook. Manual. [Istoriya gosudarstva i prava Rossii pervoj poloviny XIX veka: ucheb. Posobie] – M.: Yurlitinform [Yurlitinform], 2019. -392 p.

Davidov (1986) – Davidov I. A. Industrial legislation of Russia [Promyshlennoe zakonodatel’stvo Rossii]// Factory industry and trade of Russia [Fabrichno-zavodskaya promyshlennost’ i torgovlya Rossii]. St. Petersburg., 1896.

Dementiev, Ivashchenko (1907) – Dementiev E.M., Ivashchenko N.I. Factory legislation [Fabrichnoe zakonodatel’stvo] // Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary [Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo]: in 86 t. (82 t. and 4 additional). – St. Petersburg, 1890-1907.

Demidov (2016) – Demidov N.V. Development of norms on dismissal at the initiative of the employer in the Russian factory law of the beginning of XX [Razvitie norm ob uvol’nenii po iniciative nanimatelya v rossijskom fabrichno-zavodskom prave nachala XX] // Bulletin of Tomsk State University [Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo]. The right, №. 3 (21), 2016, pp. 131-138.

Groman (1915) – Groman V.V. Introduction [Vstuplenie]// Charter on industrial labor[Ustav o promyshlennom trude]. – St. Petersburg, 1915.

Roshchin (2013) – Roshchin B.E. Incorporation of factory and labor legislation of the Russian Empire (to the 100th anniversary of the adoption of the Charter on Industrial Labor) [Inkorporaciya fabrichno-trudovogo zakonodatel’stva Rossijskoj imperii (k 100-letiyu prinyatiya Ustava o promyshlennom trude)]// Bulletin of KSU[Vestnik KGU]. 2013. No. 3.

Lunts (1909) – Lunts M.G. From the history of factory legislation, factory inspection and the labor movement in Russia[Iz istorii fabrichnogo zakonodatel’stva, fabrichnoj inspekcii i rabochego dvizheniya v Rossii]. – M., 1909. – 384 p.

Demchenko (2004) – Demchenko M.V. From the history of the development of Russian legislation on the qualification and training of workers [Iz istorii razvitiya rossijskogo zakonodatel’stva o kvalifikacii i podgotovke rabotnikov] // Socio-political sciences [], No. 6, 2017, pp. 53-57.

Nazarov (2004) – Nazarov M.A. Russia on the eve of the Revolution and February 1917[Rossiya nakanune revolyucii i fevral’ 1917 goda] // Our contemporary[Nash sovremennik]. 2004, No. 2. pp. 145-183.

Alekseeva (2014) – Alekseeva L.V. The formation of legislation on the labor of workers in the logging industry in the pre-revolutionary period [Stanovlenie zakonodatel’stva o trude rabotnikov lesozagotovitel’noj otrasli v dorevolyucionnyj period] // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Right [Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo], No. 3, 2014, pp. 5-24.

Hohlov (1999) – Hohlov E. B. essays on the history of legal regulation of labor in Russia[Ocherki istorii pravovogo regulirovaniya truda v Rossii.]. St. Petersburg.

Litvinov-Format (1904) – Litvinov-Format V. P. // Factory legislation and factory inspection in Russia [Fabrichnoe zakonodatel’stvo i fabrichnaya inspekciya v Rossii]. SPb., 1904. P. 301 – 302.

72

Abdulvosit A. Husenov

Abdulvosit A. Husenov, Student of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Russia.

E-mail: abdulvosit507@gmail.com

Academic Supervisor: Kyrlan Marchel, Senior Lecturer, Department of Legal Regulation of Economic Activity at Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: MKyrlan@fa.ru

Self-employed citizens as subjects of economic activity

Abstract

Subject/Topic The subject of the study is the analysis of legislative provisions regulating the legal status of self-employed citizens as subjects of economic activity.

Goals/Tasks The purpose of this article is to study the legal regulation of the status of the self-employed through the prism of economic entities. To achieve this goal, the following tasks were set: to investigate the legal status of self-employed citizens, to define the definition of the self-employed through the prism of them as subjects of economic activity.

Methodology Methods of analysis, synthesis, comparison, description, methods of formal logic were used.

Conclusion There is a serious problem in the field of self-employment. The problem is also the lack of established law enforcement practice in the field of self-employment – because of this, it is unclear to what extent and how the state protects the rights of this category of persons. There is also no clarity in terms of the legal personality of self-employed persons. Most of the problems listed above can be solved by legislating the concept of self-employment. Based on the conducted research, a number of proposals are being made to improve the situation in the field of self-employment and to solve existing problems.

Keywords: self-employed; taxation; legal status of self-employed; entrepreneurial activity; professional activity.

References:

Bondarenko (2018) – Bondarenko D.V. Self-employed persons as subjects of entrepreneurial activity [Samozanyatye lica kak sub”ekty predprinimatel’skoj deyatel’nosti] // Law and politics. [Pravo i politika]. 2018. No. 5. pp.62-74.

Volovskaya (2018) – Volovskaya N.M., Plyusnina L.K., Rusina A.V., Inozemtseva A.V. Unemployment and self-employment: expectations and realities (based on materials of sociological research) [Bezrabotica i samozanyatost’: ozhidaniya i realii (po materialam sociologicheskih issledovanij)] // Theory and practice of social development [Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya] 2018. No 11 (129). pp. 22-31.

Zybunovskaya (2020) – Zybunovskaya N.V., Pokida A.N. Regulation of the activities of self-employed citizens [Regulirovanie deyatel’nosti samozanyatyh grazhdan] // Issues of state and municipal administration [Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo upravleniya] 2020. No 1. pp. 60-85.

Kleandrov (2019) – Kleandrov M.I. On the legal status of a self-employed person in the Russian Federation [K voprosu o pravovom statuse samozanyatogo lica v Rossijskoj Federacii] // Economy. Right. Society [Ekonomika. Pravo. Obshchestvo] 2019. No 2 (18). pp. 7-13.

Ruchkina (2020) – Ruchkina G.F. On the issue of improving the legal regulation of the activities of self-employed citizens in the Russian Federation [K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii pravovogo regulirovaniya deyatel’nosti samozanyatyh grazhdan v Rossijskoj Federacii] // «Taxes». [«Nalogi»] 2020. No 1. pp. 42-46.

Tarasenko (2020) – Tarasenko O.A. I would go to the self-employed, let them teach me! [YA b v samozanyatye poshel, pust’ menya nauchat!] // «Business law» [«Predprinimatel’skoe pravo»] 2020. No 2. pp. 27-33.

Shapsutova (2021) – Shapsugova M.D. On the influence of the uncertainty of the material and legal status of the self-employed on the uncertainty of his procedural status [O vliyanii neopredelennosti material’no-pravovogo statusa samozanyatogo na neopredelennost’ ego processual’nogo statusa] // «Law and Economics» [«Pravo i ekonomika»] 2021. No 3. pp. 5-9.

80