Annotation

Subjest/topic This article gives the historical and legal analysis of the professional religious education development in the Soviet Union in the context of state – religious relations during the Soviet period.

Goals/objectives The article is aimed at pointing out to the characteristics of legal regulation of the religious education in the USSR, and also at showing how the Soviet regulation in that field had been implemented in practice.

Methodology General scientific methods have been used in the analysis. The systematic approach to studying the history of legal regulation means that the legislation and its implementation practice during the Soviet period of Russian history are studied along with the inner church regulations and practice.

Conclusions The status of religious education certificates issued by religious associations during the Soviet period needs further consideration. It might be important to set up a special procedure of state recognition of the religious diplomas and degrees in theology.

Keywords: History of Law and State, Soviet Law, State – Religious Relations, Religion in the Soviet Union, Religious Education.

References:

Kozlov (2000) – Kozlov M. History of Religious Education in the Russian Orthodox Church [Istoriya religioznogo obrazovaniya v Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi] // Orthodox Encyclopedia. – М. 2000. P. 407– 426.

Chernega (2018) – Xenia (Chernega). Towards the 20 Years of Federal Law on the freedom of conscience: Historical and Legal Ovverview [K 20– letiyu prinyatiya Federal’nogo zakona o svobode sovesti: istoriko– pravovoy obzor]. – М. 2018.

Makarov (2020) – Makarov D.V. Chruch and State Criteria for Scholarly Degrees [Tserkovnye i gosudarstvennye kriterii i trebovaniya dlya polusheniya uchenykh zvanii] // M. 2020. № 2 (4). P. 34–46.

Mal’tsev, Kuznetsov (2009) – Mal’tsev G.V., Kuznetsov M.N. The Issues of Introduction of Theological Degrees and the Recognition of Ecclesiastical Diplomas According to the Constitutional and Educational Law [Voprosy vvedeniya uchenykh stepeney po teologii i priznaniya tserkovnykh diplomov s pozitsii kostitutsionnogo i obrazovatel’nogo prava] // Law and Education. 2009. № 2. – P. 4–23.

Ponkin (2003) – Ponkin I.V. Legal Foundations of Secular State and Education [Pravovye osnovy svetskosti gosudarstva i obrazovaniya]. М., 2003. 416 p.

Ponkin (2010) – Ponkin I.V. Legal Problems of Professional Religious Diplomas Recognition [Pravovye problemy priznaniya diplomov uchrezhdeniy professional’nogo religioznogo obrazovaniya] // University Lawyer. 2010. № 4. P. 6– 15.

Semenova (2020) – Semenova N.S. Contemporary Legal Status of Educational Institutions of the Russian Orthodox Church in the Russian Federation [Sovremennoe pravovoe polozhenie dukhovnykh uchebnykh zavedeniy Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi v Rossiyskoy Federatsii] // Praxis. 2020. № 2 (4). – P. 17–33.

Shakhov (2019) – Shakhov М.О. Legal Foundations for Religious Associations Performance in the Russian Federation [Pravovye osnovy deyatel’nosti religioznykh obyedineniy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii]. – М., 2019. –  P. 627–649.

Shmonin (2018) – Shmonin D.V. Technology of the Good: on the Theology of Education [Tekhnologiya Blaga: ocherki teologii obrazovaniya]. – М., 2018.

Annotation

Topic The article explores the relationship between the principles of law and a promising model of compulsory licensing in the field of intellectual property in the Russian Federation.

Research goals/objectives analysis of compulsory licensing as an intellectual property management tool in the Russian Federation through the prism of legal principles such as fairness, proportionality and legal certainty. The aim of the work is to develop a promising model that balances the interests of copyright holders and society in accordance with these principles.

Methodology Analysis of Russian legislation, international norms, foreign experience and general scientific methods, the method of comparative legal analysis was used.

Study results a promising model based on the principles of transparency and fairness of the licensing procedure, guaranteed and adequate compensation to the copyright holder, a limited license period and control over the use of intellectual property is presented. The model takes into account the balance of public and private interests. When deciding on compulsory licensing, it is proposed to take into account criteria such as access to life-saving medicines or technologies in times of crisis.

Conclusion As a result of the study, it was found that the current system of compulsory licensing in the Russian Federation needs to be improved to ensure compliance with the principles of law and increase efficiency. The developed perspective model, based on the analysis of international experience and the principles of justice, proportionality and legal certainty, offers mechanisms for balancing the interests of copyright holders and society. The implementation of the proposed recommendations will optimize the management of intellectual property and stimulate innovative development.

Keywords: compulsory licensing, civil law, patent law, compulsory licensing model.

References:

Malygina (2021) – Malygina A.M. Institute of Compulsory Licensing in the Patent Law of the Russian Federation [Institut prinuditel`nogo licenzirovaniya v patentnom prave RF] // Journal of the Intellectual Property Rights Court [“Zhurnal Suda po intellektual`ny`m pravam”], № 1 (31), mart 2021 g., s. 23-32

Latintsev, Aladysheva (2015) – Latintsev A.V., Aladysheva Zh.I. Legal aspects of compulsory licensing in pharmaceuticals, Remedium. [Pravovy`e aspekty` prinuditel`nogo licenzirovaniya v farmacevtike, Remedium] // Journal on the Russian market of drugs and medical equipment, March 2015. [Zhurnal o rossijskom ry`nke lekarstv i medicinskoj texnike], mart 2015 g., s. 58 – 59.

Abashidze, Malichenko (2019) –Abashidze A.X., Malichenko V.S. Enforcement of compulsory licensing of medicinal products in accordance with international and national law [Primenenie prinuditel`nogo licenzirovaniya lekarstvenny`x sredstv v sootvetstvii s mezhdunarodny`mi i nacional`ny`mi normami prava] // Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Legal Sciences [Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby` narodov. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki]. 2019. v. 23. № 1. s. 62-79.

Balashova (2024) –Balashova A.I. Terms for claiming compulsory licenses due to non-use or insufficient use of the patented object [Sroki istrebovaniya prinuditel`ny`x licenzij v svyazi s neispol`zovaniem ili nedostatochny`m ispol`zovaniem zapatentovannogo ob`ekta] // Journal of the Intellectual Property Court. [Zhurnal Suda po intellektual`ny`m pravam]. Iyun` 2024. N 2 (44). s. 246-256.

Grudcina (2024) – Grudcina L.Y. Experience of compulsory licensing in the USA [Opy`t prinuditel`nogo licenzirovaniya v SShA]. //Education and rights. [Obrazovanie i parvo]. №5, 2024. s. 342-345.

Al`bov, Volkov, Golubev (2024) – Compulsory licensing based on state, public and other public interest: theoretical, legal and socio-economic aspects: monograph. [Prinuditel`noe licenzirovanie po motivam gosudarstvennogo, obshhestvennogo i inogo publichnogo interesa: teoretiko-pravovoj i social`no-e`konomicheskij aspekt: monografiya]– M.: FGBOU VO RGAIS, 2024. – 112 s.

Ivanov (2017) – Ivanov A.Yu. Compulsory licensing for innovative development: on the need to balance the intellectual property rights regime [Prinuditel`noe licenzirovanie dlya innovacionnogo razvitiya: o neobxodimosti balansirovki rezhima intellektual`ny`x prav] // Law [Zakon]. 2017. № 5. s. 23-29.

Annotation

Subject/topic The exponential development of technologies equipped with artificial intelligence gives rise to disputes not only about their potential legal capacity, but also about what the liability will be in the event of harm caused by these technologies, and who will be the subject of this liability. In this article, the author will try to reveal some of the approaches to the models of liability for harm caused by artificial intelligence technologies.

Goals/objectives The purpose of the study is to analyze some approaches to liability for harm caused by artificial intelligence technologies that exist in the scientific world. The objective of the study is an attempt to draw a conclusion about the most optimal algorithm of actions when deciding on establishing the subject responsible for the harm caused by the technologies in question.

Methodology The methodological basis of the study was made up of both general scientific and specific scientific methods: formal-legal, comparative-legal.

Results/conclusions In the course of the analysis, the author comes to the conclusion that the most optimal option when considering the issue of choosing a liability model for harm caused by artificial intelligence technologies is the institution of a source of increased danger. It seems that this model is aimed at ensuring the protection of citizens’ rights, since it allows us to clearly determine who is the responsible subject, namely the owner of such a source. In order to eliminate legal uncertainty when extending the provisions of Article 1079 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the author believes it is appropriate to make appropriate changes to this article.

Keywords: artificial intelligence, human rights, civil code, responsibility, source of increased danger.

References:

Amelin, Channov (2022) – Amelin R.V., Channov S.E. The concept of integration of legal phenomena related to the development of modern digital technologies into the Russian legal system [Koncepciya integracii pravovyh yavlenij, svyazannyh s razvitiem sovremennyh cifrovyh tekhnologij, v rossijskuyu pravovuyu sistemu] // Legal policy and legal life [Pravovaya politika I pravovaya zhizn’]. – 2022. – No 4. – P. 151-164.

Vasil’ev, Shpopper, Mataeva (2018) – Vasil’ev A.A., Shpopper D., Mataeva M.H. The term «artificial intelligence» in Russian law: a doctrinal analysis [Termin «iskusstvennyj intellekt» v rossijskom prave: doktrinal’nyj analiz] // Legal Linguistics [Yurislingvistika]. – 2018. – No 7-8. – P. 35-44.

Gadzhiev (2018) – Gadzhiev G.A. Is a robot-agent a Person? (Searching for Legal Forms to Regulate the Digital Economy) [Yavlyaetsya li robot-agent licom? (Poisk pravovyh form dlya regulirovaniya cifrovoj̆ ekonomiki)] // Journal of Russian Law [Zhurnal rossijskogo prava]. – 2018. – No 1. – P. 15-30.

Gorohova (2021) – Gorohova S.S. Theoretical approaches to public legal liability in the field of artificial intelligence systems [Teoreticheskie podhody k publichnoj yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti v sfere ispol’zovaniya iskusstvennyh intellektual’nyh system] // Modern lawyer [Sovremennyj yurist]. – 2021. – No 2 (35). – P. 23-31.

Kutejnikov, Izhaev, Zenin, Lebedev (2022) – Kutejnikov D.L., Izhaev O.A., Zenin S.S., Lebedev V.A. Artificial Intelligence and Law: From Fundamental Problems to Applied Tasks: Monograph [Iskusstvennyj intellekt i pravo: ot fundamental’nyh problem k prikladnym zadacham: monografiya]. – M.: Prospekt, 2022. – P. 104.

Laptev (2019) – Laptev V.A. The concept of artificial intelligence and legal responsibility for its work [Ponyatie iskusstvennogo intellekta i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ za ego rabotu] // Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics [Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki]. – 2019. – No 2. – P. 79-102.

Morhat (2017) – Morhat P.M. Artificial Intelligence: A Legal Perspective [Iskusstvennyj intellekt: pravovoj vzglyad]. — M.: Buki Vedi, 2017. — P. 257.

Morhat (2017) – Morhat P.M. Problems of determining legal liability for the actions of artificial intelligence [Problemy opredeleniya yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti za dejstviya iskusstvennogo intellekta] // LAW AND STATE: Theory and Practice [PRAVO I GOSUDARSTVO: teoriya i praktika]. – 2017. – № 9 (153). – P. 70-74.

Mosechkin (2019) – Mosechkin I.N. Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Liability: Problems of Formation of a New Type of Subject of a Crime [Iskusstvennyĭ intellect i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost’: problemy stanovleniya novogo vida sub”ekta prestupleniya] // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Law [Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo]. – 2019. – № 10 (3). – P. 461-476.

Ovchinskij, Larina (2019) – Ovchinskij V.S, Larina E.S. Artificial Intelligence. Ethics and Law. «Book World» [Iskusstvennyj intellekt. Etika i pravo. «Knizhnyj mir»]. – 2019. –  P. 92.

Annotation

Subject / topic. The scientific article describes various doctrinal approaches in the legal literature and shows their impact on the development of Russian legislation on the use of artificial intelligence for business purposes in the context of technological transformations at the present stage.

Goals / objectives. The purpose of the article is to establish promising directions for the development of legislation on the use of artificial intelligence in business and other activities, taking into account the formation of consensus in understanding the legal content of the concept of artificial intelligence and its legal nature among legislators and law enforcement officials.

Methodology. Being end-to-end, artificial intelligence technologies have an interdisciplinary and intersectoral character, and the definitions formulated in legislative acts should reflect their legal content and correspond to the signs of legal certainty, so that there are no discrepancies and ambiguity of their understanding in the law enforcement process, including in business activities.

It is important to take into account the breadth of industry-specific applications of artificial intelligence and the multilevel nature of legal regulation, which will make it possible to develop an optimal model of legal support for the introduction of future technologies, in general, and taking into account industry specifics, in particular.

Keywords: artificial intelligence, technology, economics, entrepreneurial activity, law, legislation, legal doctrine.

References:

Andreev (2020) – Andreev V.K. Dynamics of legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence [Dinamika pravovogo regulirovaniya primeneniya iskusstvennogo intellekta] // Journal of Russian Law. [Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava] 2020. No. 3. pp. 58-68.

Vitko (2019) – Vitko V. Analysis of scientific ideas about the author and the rights to the results of artificial intelligence [Analiz nauchnykh predstavleniy ob avtore i pravakh na rezul’taty deyatel’nosti iskusstvennogo intellekta] // IS. Copyright and related rights. [IS. Avtorskoye pravo i smezhnyye prava.] 2019. No. 2. pp. 5 -20.

Gurko (2024) – Gurko A.V. On the possibility of copyright protection of objects generated by artificial intelligence systems [O vozmozhnosti avtorsko-pravovoy okhrany ob”yektov, generiruyemykh sistemami iskusstvennogo intellekta] // Journal of Russian Law. [Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava]  2024. No. 7. pp. 64-77.

Ivliev, Egorova (2022) – Ivliev G.P., Egorova M.A. Legal problems of the legal status of artificial intelligence and products created by artificial intelligence systems [Yuridicheskaya problematika pravovogo statusa iskusstvennogo intellekta i produktov, sozdannykh sistemami iskusstvennogo intellekta] // Journal of Russian Law. [Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava.] 2022. No. 6. pp. 38-43.

Kalyaev (2019) – Kalyaev I. The program for the development of artificial intelligence in the Russian Federation needs adjustments [Programme razvitiya iskusstvennogo intellekta v RF nuzhna korrektirovka] [Electronic resource] URL: https://rg.ru/2019/06/25/programme-razvitiia-iskusstvennogo-intellekta-v-rf-nuzhna-korrektirovka.html(date of access:02/26/2025).

Neznamov, Naumov (2019) – Neznamov A., Naumov V. Model Convention on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence. Rules for the creation and use of robots and artificial intelligence. [Model’naya konventsiya o robototekhnike i iskusstvennom intellekte. Pravila sozdaniya i ispol’zovaniya robotov i iskusstvennogo intellekta] [Electronic resource] URL: https://robopravo.ru/modielnaia_konvientsiia (date of request: 22/02/2025).

Orlova (2022) – Orlova T.E. Copyright on the results of artificial intelligence activities [Avtorskoye pravo na rezul’taty deyatel’nosti iskusstvennogo intellekta] // IS. Copyright and related rights. [IS. Avtorskoye pravo i smezhnyye prava.] 2022. No. 11. pp. 64-68.

Petyukova (2024) – Petyukova O.N. Foresight of university legal education and the legal potential of youth education [Forsayt universitetskogo yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya i pravovoy potentsial vospitaniya molodezhi] Bulletin of the O.E. Kutafin University (MGUA). // [Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.Ye. Kutafina (MGYUA)]. 2024. No. 12. pp. 154-161.

Poduzova (2024) – Poduzova E.B. Application of artificial intelligence technologies in the provision of services: a civilist’s view on the problem [Primeneniye tekhnologiy iskusstvennogo intellekta pri okazanii uslug: vzglyad tsivilista na problem] // Actual problems of Russian law. [Aktual’nyye problemy rossiyskogo prava] 2024. No. 8. pp. 76-84.

Ruchkina (2021) – Ruchkina G.F. Certain areas of legal regulation of artificial intelligence, robots and robotics facilities in the Russian Federation [Otdel’nyye napravleniya pravovogo regulirovaniya iskusstvennogo intellekta, robotov i ob”yektov robototekhniki v Rossiyskoy Federatsii] // Banking law. [Bankovskoye pravo] 2021. No. 6. pp. 42-45.

Kucherov,Sinitsyn (2022) – Digitaleconomy:currentdirections of legalregulation: a scientific and practicalguide/edited by I.I.Kucherov,S.A.Sinitsyn.Moscow:IZiSP,NORMA,2022.

Shakhnazarov (2022) – Shakhnazarov B.A. Legal regulation of relations using artificial intelligence [Pravovoye regulirovaniye otnosheniy s ispol’zovaniyem iskusstvennogo intellekta] // Actual problems of Russian law. [Aktual’nyye problemy rossiyskogo prava.] 2022. No. 9. pp. 63-72.

Annotation

The subject/topic The article is devoted to the study of the experience of the Roman Empire as a basis for the development of modern sustainable models of public administration and national branding.

Goals/objectives. The aim is to study the patterns that ensured the success and sustainability of the Roman Empire, and to adapt them to enhance the competitiveness of modern states. Special attention is paid to building economic and social models focused on the development of human capital, legal protection and the creation of an attractive image of the state.

Methodology The work uses an interdisciplinary approach combining historical analysis, marketing research and modern technologies, including blockchain, artificial intelligence and smart contracts. The article examines the practices of adapting Rome’s experience through the prism of modern theories of country marketing, investment, and citizen happiness.

Conclusions An analysis of the experience of the Roman Empire shows that the sustainability of the state system is achieved by meeting the needs of citizens, increasing their level of happiness and creating a strong national brand. Modern technologies and marketing approaches make it possible to turn historical lessons into tools for strengthening international competitiveness and attracting investments. The main factor in the success of the state remains the focus on the well-being of the population, which lays the foundation for long-term growth and stability.

Keywords: human capital, Roman Empire, Ancient Rome, national brand, added value.

References:

Nedilko (2009) – Nedilko Yu. V. Interpretation of positive law from the position of Roman lawyers [Tolkovanie pozitivnogo prava s pozicii rimskih yuristov] // Society and Law. [Obshchestvo i pravo.]. 2009. No. 1 (23). p. 59-62.

Soldatova (2022) – Soldatova N.F., Rebrikova N.V. Social marketing: trends of the past and realities of the present [Social`ny`j marketing: tendencii proshlogo i realii nastoyashhego] // Innovations and Investments [Innovacii i investicii]. 2022. No. 9. p. 89-94.

Pavlov (2024) – Pavlov O. V. The phenomenon of the middle class in ancient rome in the transition period from republic to empire and the analysis of the evolution of motivating factors of the social and economic-legal stratum “middle class” [Fenomen srednego klassa v drevnem rime perexodnogo perioda ot respubliki k imperii i analiz e`volyucii motiviruyushhix faktorov social`noj i e`konomichesko-pravovoj straty` «srednij klass»] // Bulletin of the Tajik State University of Law, Business and Politics. Series of Social Sciences 2024 VAK [Vestnik Tadzhikskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta prava, biznesa i politiki. Seriya obshhestvenny`x nauk 2024 VAK]. 2024. №3 (100). p. 5-14.

Zhidkova (2013) – Zhidkova O.S. Economic efficiency of public services [E`konomicheskaya e`ffektivnost` gosudarstvenny`x uslug] // The age of quality [Vek kachestva]. 2013. No. 1. p. 8-9.

Ukolova (2008) – Ukolova V.I. Empire: the historical experience of Rome [Imperiya: istoricheskij opy`t Rima] // Bulletin of MGIMO University [Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta]. 2008. p. 3-10.

Kartskhiya (2019) – Kartskhiya A.A. Civil law model of regulation of digital technologies [Grazhdansko- pravovaya model` regulirovaniya cifrovy`x texnologi]. Moscow, 2019. 394 p

Baeva (2002) – Baeva I.A. Psychological safety in education: a monograph [Psixologicheskaya bezopasnost` v obrazovanii: monografiya]. St. Petersburg: Publishing House “SOYUZ”, 2002. 271 p.

Plotnikova, Puchnin (2022) — Plotnikova T.V., Puchnin V.M. Strategic national priorities of national security of the Russian Federation: theoretical and legal aspects [Strategicheskie nacional`ny`e prioritety` nacional`noj bezopasnosti Rossijskoj Federacii: teoretiko-pravovy`e aspekty`] // Law and the State: theory and practice [Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika]. 2022. № 12 (216).

Guryev (2021) – Guryev, V.V. The culture of law-making as a factor in improving the quality of legal life in society [Kul`tura pravotvorchestva kak faktor povy`sheniya kachestva pravovoj zhizni obshhestva] // Legal culture [Pravovaya kul`tura]. 2021. No. 2. pp. 106-107.

Afanasyev (2020) – Afanasyev, I.V. Legal culture as an educational phenomenon [Pravovaya kul`tura kak obrazovatel`ny`j fenomen] // Law and education [Pravo i obrazovanie]. 2020. No. 1. pp. 73-78.

Abstract

The article provides a scientific analysis of the content of the monograph by Doctor of Law Maryam Vladimirovna Anisiforova, dedicated to the insufficiently studied problem of administrative and legal regulation of the circulation of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, their analogues, new potentially dangerous psychoactive substances, as well as drug-containing plants and parts of such plants (hereinafter collectively referred to as drugs, unless otherwise specified). The relevance of the research topic is confirmed, the positive and most controversial aspects and moments of the research are noted: original author’s conclusions, judgments, inferences, statements, arguments, proposals and recommendations that are important both for public law doctrine and for the practice of state and municipal administration in terms of control (supervision) over the legal circulation and consumption of drugs. The merit of the research is its interdisciplinary nature, it is based on the provisions of jurisprudence, management theory, philosophy, psychology, medicine, including psychiatry, sociology, morality, ethics, morality and other areas of scientific knowledge. Attention is drawn to individual aspects and fragments of the monographic research, leaving room for scientific controversy. A final assessment of the monograph is given, recommendations are made regarding the continuation of research in this direction.

Keywords: administrative and legal regulation, drug trafficking, systemology, administrative responsibility, public law.

References:

Voronin (2013) – Voronin M.Yu. On the relationship between state anti-drug policy and criminal policy in the field of drug control // Modern lawyer. [K voprosu o sootnoshenii gosudarstvennoj antinarkoticheskoj politiki i ugolovnoj politiki v oblasti kontrolya za oborotom narkotikov // Sovremennyj yurist] 2013. No. 2(3). Pp. 68 – 76.

Nasyrov (2022) – Nasyrov R.R. Some aspects of combating illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and their analogues // Actual problems of combating crime: issues of theory and practice. Proceedings of the XXV international scientific and practical conference. In 2 parts. Krasnoyarsk [Nekotorye aspekty protivodejstviya nezakonnomu oborotu narkoticheskih sredstv, psihotropnyh veshchestv i ih analogov // Aktual’nye problemy bor’by s prestupnost’yu: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Materialy XXV mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. V 2-h chastyah] 2022. Pp. 33-34.

Morozov, Shulzhenko (2020) – Morozov A.V., Shulzhenko O.V. On some issues of combating illegal trafficking of new synthetic narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances // Artificial intelligence (big data) in the service of the police. Collection of articles from the international scientific and practical conference. – Moscow: Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia [O nekotoryh voprosah bor’by s nezakonnym oborotom novyh sinteticheskih narkoticheskih sredstv i psihotropnyh veshchestv // Iskusstvennyj intellekt (bol’shie dannye) na sluzhbe policii. Sbornik statej mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. – Moskva: Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii] 2020. Pp. 165-171.

Bezyazykova (2023) – Bezyazykova N.P. Administrative and legal measures to combat the illegal consumption of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances // Actual problems of combating crime: issues of theory and practice. Proceedings of the XXVI International Scientific and Practical Conference. – Krasnoyarsk [Administrativno-pravovye mery po protivodejstviyu nezakonnomu potrebleniyu narkoticheskih sredstv, psihotropnyh veshchestv // Aktual’nye problemy bor’by s prestupnost’yu: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Materialy XXVI Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii] 2023. Pp. 27-29.

Dizer (2012) – Dizer O.A. Some administrative and legal problems of combating offenses in the sphere of illegal trafficking of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances // Legislation and practice [Nekotorye administrativno-pravovye problemy protivodejstviya pravonarusheniyam v sfere nezakonnogo oborota narkoticheskih sredstv i psihotropnyh veshchestv // Zakonodatel’stvo i praktika] 2012. No. 1(28). P. 67-69.

Stepanenko (2023) – Stepanenko Yu.V. Review of the monograph by M.V. Anisiforova “Administrative and legal incentives” // Modern lawyer [Recenziya na monografiyu M.V. Anisiforovoj «Administrativno-pravovoe stimulirovanie» // Sovremennyj yurist] 2023. No. 1 (42). P. 106-112.

Anisiforova (2023) – Anisiforova M.V. Administrative and legal incentives: monograph. – Moscow: Prospect [Administrativno-pravovoe stimulirovanie: monografiya. – Moskva: Prospekt] 2023. – 208 p.