The Modern Lawyer № 2 (47)

 

CONTENT

 

THEORY AND HISTORY OF LAW

Yury V. Zudov

Candidate of History, Associate Professor, Department of State and Law History at Kutafin Moscow State Law Unisersity, Moscow, Russia.

Email: yury.zudov@mail.ru

Soviet legal regulation of religion and the Russian orthodox church in 1940s – 1980s

Annotation

Subject/topic This article examines the relationship between religious organizations and governmental authorities in the USSR from 1940s to 1980s within the framework of the legal field.

Goals/objectives The focus is on the development of legal foundations in the religious sphere, as well as the relationship between legal norms and enforcement practices during different periods of the Soviet Union’s existence.

Methodology Based on a chronological analysis of normative acts, the legal foundations for control and interaction with religious organizations are determined. Through a diachronic analysis, a comparison is made between legal documents and enforcement practices in the USSR regarding religious organizations and their representatives during different periods, with a focus on the difference between declared legal norms and the issuance of internal circular letters within the relevant ministries responsible for religious organization control.

Conclusions A qualitative difference is revealed in the vector of interaction between Soviet authorities and the church before and after 1943. The article analyzes how the same legal norms could be implemented in completely different practices depending on the specific goals of local and supreme authorities. The article also discusses the mechanisms of legal regulation of religious organizations during different stages of the development of Soviet legislative and executive power. Key differences between approaches to state-religious relations during different periods of Soviet leadership are identified.

Keywords: state-religious relations, church and state, Soviet state, legal acts, religious policy.

References:

Lenin (1909) – Lenin V. I. On the Workers’ Party Attitude Towards Religion [Ob otnoshenii rabochej partii k religii (13 (26) maja 1909 g.)]: v 55 t. Moskva, Izdatel’stvo politicheskoj literatury, T. 17, 418 p.

Dalk (1957) – Dalk S. N. Soviet Date Decrees [Dekrety Sovetskoj vlasti]: v 2 t. Moskva, Politizdat, 640 p.

Krivov (1997) – Krivov N. A. State and Church in 1922 – 1925. Politburo and GPU Fight for the Church Treasures and Political Subordination of the Clergy [Vlast’ i Cerkov’ v 1922 – 1925 gg. Politbjuro i GPU v bor’be za cerkovnye cennosti i politicheskoe podchinenie duhovenstva]. Moskva, AIRO-HH, 250 p.

Petyukova (2011) – Petyukova O. N. Legal Forms of Relationship Between the Soviet State and the Russian Orthodox Church in 1917 1945 [Pravovye formy otnoshenij sovetskogo gosudarstva и Russkoj pravoslavnoj tserkvi v 1917-1945 godah: dissertatsija doktora juridicheskih nauk]. Moskva, 494 p.

Vasiljeva (2004) – Vasilyeva O. Ju. Russian Orthodox Church and Vatican II [Russkaja Pravoslavnaja Cerkov’ i Vtoroj Vatikanskij Sobor]. Moskva, Lepta, 380 p.

Odincov (2002) – Odincov M. I. Russian Orthodox Church in the XXth Century: the History of Relationships with State and Society [Russkaja pravoslavnaja cerkov’ v XX veke: istorija, vzaimootnoshenija s gosudarstvom i obshhestvom]. Moskva, ROIR, 312 p.

Aleksandrov (2022) – Aleksandrov K. For Anti-Soviet Campaign and Propaganda [Za antisovetskuju agitaciju i propaganda]. Diletant. no. 73, 77 p.

Junusova (1999) – Junusova A. B. Islam in Bashkortostan [Islam v Bashkortostane].  Ufa, Ufimskij poligrafkombinat, 213 p.

Shkarovskij (1999) – Shkarovskij M. V. Russian Orthodox Church under Stalin and Khruschev: State-Church Relations in the USSR in 1939-1964 [Russkaja Pravoslavnaja Cerkov’ pri Staline i Hrushheve (gosudarstvenno-cerkovnye otnoshenija v SSSR v 1939–1964 godah)]. Moskva, Krutickoe patriarshee podvor’e, 400 p.

Chumachenko (2014) – Chumachenko T. A. The State and the Russian Orthodox Church in 1958-1964: a New Poitical War Against Religion, Church, and Believers [Gosudarstvo i Russkaja pravoslavnaja cerkov’ v 1958-1964 godah: novaja politicheskaja vojna s religiej, cerkov’ju i verujushhimi]. Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no 19, 82-90 pp.

Shadrina (2019) – Shadrina A. V. The Key Directions and Methods of the Soviet Anti-Religious Policy in 1958s-1960s (the Example of Rostov Region) [Osnovnye napravlenija i metody sovetskoj antireligioznoj politiki v 1958-1960-h gg. (na primere pravoslavnyh prihodov Rostovskoj oblasti)]. Nauchnaja mysl’ Kavkaza, no. 4, 62-69 pp.

Odincov (2014) – Odincov M. I. Russian Orthodox Church Before and During Stalin’s Socialism Epoch [Russkaja pravoslavnaja cerkov’ nakanune i v jepohu stalinskogo socializma. 1917-1953 gg]. Moskva: Politicheskaja jenciklopedija, 424 p.

9
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW  

Anton А. Shkiperov

Assistant to the President of the Fishery Shipowners Association (FCA); Adviser to the General Director of the Association of Business Partners in the Sphere of Foreign Economic Activity (ABP FEA); Member of the Customs Affairs Committee of «OPORA RUSSIA», Moscow, Russia.

E-mail: shkiperov@fsarf.ru

Alevtina V. Ivanushchenko

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor of the Department of Customs Payments of the Russian Customs Academy, Moscow, Russia.

E-mail: av.ivanushenko@customs-academy.ru

Evolution of legal regulation of cross-border electronic commerce in the Russian Federation in the context of eurasian integration (part one)

Annotation

The present article examines the legal regulation of cross-border electronic commerce in the Russian Federation in the context of Eurasian integration, examines the problems of the formation, functioning and development of this institution and suggests ways to improve it.

Subject/topic Legal regulation of public relations related to the implementation of cross-border electronic commerce in the Russian Federation in the context of Eurasian integration

Goals/task The purpose of the present article is to identify the features of the evolution of legal regulation of cross-border electronic commerce, substantiate the need for the establishment and development of the institution of cross-border electronic commerce in the system of customs law norms, identify existing and perspective problems of regulation of cross-border electronic commerce based on the results of the analysis, as well as international standards and practices, and develop proposals for their solution.

Methodology The methodological apparatus consists of special methods of scientific cognition characteristic of jurisprudence: historical, theoretical-prognostic, comparative legal method, formal legal, systemic-structural, legal modeling, as well as general methods of scientific cognition: abstraction, induction, deduction, hypothesis, analogy, synthesis, typology, classification, systematization, generalization and others.

Results/Conclusions The features of the evolution of the legal regulation of cross-border electronic commerce in the Russian Federation in the conditions of the EAEU are revealed, the key problems of improving the regulation of this institution are identified and proposals for their solution are formulated.

Keywords: legal regulation, cross-border electronic commerce, electronic commerce goods, Customs Code of the Eurasian Economic Union, Eurasian integration.

References:

Agamagomedova, Trubnikova (2017) – Agamagomedova, S. A., Trubnikova O. Y. Problems of legal regulation of cross-border e-commerce. [Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya transgranichnoj elektronnoj kommercii] Customs business and foreign economic activity of companies 1 [Tamozhennoe delo i vneshneekonomicheskaya deyatel’nost’ kompanij]. – 2017 – pp. 450-464.

Bagdasaryan, Shpiruk, Khodyakov, Kopyl, Torba (2020) – Bagdasaryan L.A., Shpiruk S.E., Khodyakov E.A., Kopyl V.D., Torba V.D. Problems of regulation of cross-border electronic commerce in the Russian Federation [Problemy regulirovaniya transgranichnoj elektronnoj torgovli v Rossijskoj Federacii] Russian Economic Bulletin – 2020. – Volume 3, No. 1 – pp. 117-123

Golubeva, Kozyrskaya (2020) – Golubeva A.S., Kozyrskaya I.E. The e-commerce market: global trends and Russian realities [Rynok elektronnoj kommercii: mirovye tendencii i rossijskie realii] // Economics: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2020.

Korol (2024) – Korol T.A. “Digital transformation of the EAEU trade sphere.” [Cifrovaya transformaciya sfery torgovli EAES]. 2024.

Lebedev (2020) – Lebedev A. S. “Problems of legal regulation of cross-border electronic commerce in the Eurasian Economic Union.” [Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya transgranichnoj elektronnoj torgovli v Evrazijskom ekonomicheskom soyuze] Eurasian integration: Economics, law, politics 2 (32) (2020): 65-71.

Parfenov, Nos, Zhao (2024) – Parfenov A.V., Nos V.A., Ts. Zhao. “The application of a logistics approach and digital technologies in cross-border e-commerce.” [Primenenie logisticheskogo podhoda i cifrovyh tekhnologij v transgranichnoj elektronnoj kommercii] Economics 14.1 (2024): 93-106.

Revina, Luneva (2023) – Revina S. N., Luneva U. S. Issues of customs regulation in the context of the development of online commerce. [Tamozhennogo regulirovaniya v usloviyah razvitiya internet-torgovli] International Scientific Research Journal 4 (130) (2023): 47.

Shimanskaya (2023) – Shimanskaya A.V. “Regulation of some aspects of electronic commerce in the context of the formation of the digital space of the EAEU.” [Regulirovanie nekotoryh aspektov elektronnoj torgovli v kontekste formirovaniya cifrovogo prostranstva EAES]. 2023.

Skipper A.A., Albov (2022) – Skipper A.A., Albov A.P. Functions of the Russian state and customs law in the regulation and development of the Internettrade. [Funkcii rossijskogo gosudarstva i tamozhennogo prava v regulirovanii i razvitii internet-torgovli]. Modern Lawyer. – 2022. – 3(40) July-September – pp. 1-14.

Yaskov (2023) – Yaskov A.A. “The evolution of the formation of international law in the field of electronic commerce.” [Evolyuciya formirovaniya mezhdunarodnogo prava v sfere elektronnoj torgovli]. Legal Science 12 (2023): 189-195.

23
PROCEDURAL LAW  

Elena A. Zolotovskaya

Senior Lecturer of the Department of Civil Law Disciplines of the Institute of Law of Vladivostok State University.

E-mail: elena-zlato@rambler.ru

Features of the civil procedure legislation of the people's republic of China

Abstract

Subject/topic The subject of the study was constitutional and legal relations related to the organization of judicial power in the People’s Republic of China, as well as civil procedural relations under Chinese law.

Goals/objectives The purpose of the study is to analyze the main institutions of civil procedure of the People’s Republic of China in comparison with the institutions of civil procedure in Russia, to determine the general and special characteristics of both models of civil procedure, to identify the directions of their development and possible borrowings of the most valuable experience of civil procedure regulation. The purpose of the study is to analyze the special civil procedural procedures of the People’s Republic of China, as well as to analyze and summarize the technological and legal situations related to digitalization in the People’s Republic of China, to identify the main models and directions for further development of electronic and software tools of legal regulation.

Methodology The research methodology consisted of both general scientific (epistemological, systemic, structural and functional), sociological (statistical) and special legal (positivist, historical-legal and comparative-legal) methods.

Conclusion A comparative analysis of the sectoral legal systems of different states makes it possible not only to identify their national characteristics, but also to borrow, if possible, those solutions that legislators use to solve many identical problems of legal regulation. The Chinese experience of civil procedure is especially significant not only in connection with its modernization and the developed practice of mass and versatile application of procedural norms, but also the best practices of introducing integrated digitalization and, moreover, artificial intelligence into Chinese legal proceedings. Based on the analysis of the civil procedure legislation of the People’s Republic of China, its features were identified, including (from the point of view of the Russian science of civil procedure) shortcomings, and proposals were made to borrow a number of procedural norms and legislative techniques.

Keywords: the civil procedure of the People’s Republic of China, the Civil Procedure Code of the People’s Republic of China, digitalization of civil procedure of the People’s Republic of China, legislator, legal proceedings, evidence.

References:

Huang (2008) – Huang S. Judicial evidence in civil proceedings: the experience of comparative jurisprudence on the example of Russia and China: dis. … cand. Jurid. sciences’: 12.00.01. [Sudebnye dokazatel’stva v grazhdanskom processe: opyt sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya na primere Rossii i Kitaya]. Moscow, 2008. 179 p.

Kumanin (1990) – Kumanin E.V. Legal policy and legal system of the People’s Republic of China [YUridicheskaya politika i pravovaya sistema Kitajskoj Narodnoj Respubliki]. Moscow: Nauka, 1990. 157 p.

Sapega (2012) – Sapega A.V. Features of civil proceedings in the People’s Republic of China [Osobennosti grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva v Kitajskoj Narodnoj Respublike]. Customs policy of Russia in the Far East. – 2012. – No. 4. – pp. 102-110.

Sukharev (2003) – Ed. by Sukharev A.Ya. Legal systems of the countries of the world: An encyclopedic reference book [Pravovye sistemy stran mira: Enciklopedicheskij spravochnik]. 3rd ed., reprint. and add. Moscow: Norma, 2003. 967 p.

Xu (2010) – Xu Ts. The principle of “one State, two systems” and the operation of the laws of the People’s Republic of China in special administrative regions [Princip «odno gosudarstvo, dve sistemy» i dejstvie zakonov KNR v osobyh administrativnyh rajonah]. Constitutional and municipal law. 2010. No. 3. pp. 72-76.

Zhihua (2012) – Zhihua V. Judicial clarifications in the development of civil law of the People’s Republic of China [Sudebnye raz”yasneniya v razvitii grazhdanskogo prava Kitajskoj Narodnoj Respubliki]. // A Russian judge. 2012. No. 4. pp. 34-36.

On the organization of People’s Courts: The Law of the People’s Republic of China dated 01.01.1989 // People’s Republic of China. The Constitution and legislative acts [Ob organizacii narodnyh sudov: Zakon KNR ot 01.01.1989 // Kitajskaya Narodnaya Respublika. Konstituciya i zakonodatel’nye akty]. Moscow: Progress, 1984. pp. 111-120.

43
URBAN PLANNING LAW  

Almaz N. Kuchembaev

Founder and head of the law agency «Kuchembaev and Partners», lecturer at the Kutafin Moscow State Law University.

Email: czvp01@mail.ru

Andrey Y. Nefedov

Head of the practice of urban planning disputes of the law agency «Kuchembaev and Partners».

The decision on the complex development of the territory as a legal act

Annotation

Subject/topic The article analyzes the legal nature of the decision on integrated development of the territory (decision on urban territory transformation) in the context of its recognition as a normative legal act.

Goals/objectives. The author pursues the task of identifying the signs of normative legal acts on the basis of relevant judicial practice and the Russian doctrine of law, dissecting the decision on the integrated development of the territory, identifying its components and comparing them with the designated signs of normative legal acts. This analysis will allow us to draw a conclusion about the nature of such an act of state power as a decision on the integrated development of the territory (decision on urban territory transformation).

Methodology General scientific methods contributed to the analysis and synthesis of the scientific problem under study.

Conclusions An analysis of scientific works, legislation and practice shows that the decision on integrated development (decision on urban territory transformation) lies within the territory of all these regulatory legal acts, which simultaneously indicates the possibility of more extensive judicial control over the adoption of such an act by the authorized body, as well as the risks associated with possible consequences. challenging such an act throughout its entire duration, as well as even in the event of its cancellation, which entails a chain of negative consequences for the entire ongoing action of the project.

Keywords: complex development of the territory; integrated development; normative legal act; non-normative legal act; signs of a normative act; norms of law; KRT; decision on KRT; decision on integrated development; decision on urban territory transformation.

References:

Kelsen (2015) – Kelsen G. Pure doctrine of law [Chistoe uchenie o prave]. 2nd ed./trans. with him. M.V. Antonov and S.V. Lezova. – St. Petersburg: LLC Publishing House “Alef-Press”, 2015. – P. 84.

Chinnova (2010) – Chinnova M.V. Signs of a normative legal act [Priznaki normativnogo pravovogo akta] // Problems of economics and legal practice. 2010. No. 3. pp. 35 – 38.

Alekseev (1973) – Alekseev S.S. Problems of the theory of law: Course of lectures: In 2 vols. [Problemy teorii prava: Kurs lekcij: V 2 tomah] T. 2. Sverdlovsk, 1973. P. 24.

Nikitin (2010) – Nikitin S.V. Judicial control over normative legal acts in civil and arbitration proceedings: monograph. [Sudebnyj kontrol’ za normativnymi pravovymi aktami v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom processe: monografiya] M.: RAP, WoltersKluwer, 2010. – 304 р.

Umanskaya (2019) – Umanskaya V.P. Modern approaches to the concept of normative legal acts in science and practice [Sovremennye podhody k ponyatiyu normativnyh pravovyh aktov v nauke i praktike] // Vestnik VSU. Series: Law. 2019. No. 3 (38). pp. 148 – 156.

Berezhnov (2004) – Berezhnov A.G., Vorotilin E.A., Kenenov A.A. and others. Theory of state and law: Textbook for universities. [Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik dlya vuzov] – M.: Mirror, ed. Marchenko M.N. 2004. – 800 p.

Jousse-Ivanina (2008) – Jousse-Ivanina M. Law on normative legal acts: some problems of regulating the system of normative legal acts of the Russian Federation [Zakon o normativnyh pravovyh aktah: nekotorye problemy regulirovaniya sistemy normativnyh pravovyh aktov RF] // Bulletin of Moscow University. Episode 11. Law. 2008. No. 5. pp. 67-77.

Atagimova (2019) – Atagimova E.I. Determining the normativity of a legal act: doctrinal understanding and practice of law enforcement [Opredelenie normativnosti pravovogo akta: doktrinal’noe ponimanie i praktika pravoprimeneniya] // Monitoring of law enforcement. 2019. No. 2 (31). pp. 4–9.

Narysheva (2015) – Narysheva N.G. Legal nature of acts establishing the legal regime of land plots [Yuridicheskaya priroda aktov, ustanavlivayushchih pravovoj rezhim zemel’nyh uchastkov] // Legal science. 2015. No. 4. pp. 86 – 91.

Belitskaya (2023) – Belitskaya A.V., Kukharenko L.V. Integrated development of the territory as a legal instrument of public-private partnership [Kompleksnoe razvitie territorii kak pravovoj instrument gosudarstvennochastnogo partnerstva] // Lawyer. – 2023. – No. 2. – P. 27-32.

Bandorin, Basharin (2021) – Bandorin L.E., Basharin A.V. On the provision of land plots during the integrated development of the territory at the initiative of right holders [O predostavlenii zemel’nyh uchastkov pri kompleksnom razvitii territorii po iniciative pravoobladatelej] // Law. 2021. No. 11. P. 41 – 52.

Shulzhenko (2022) – Shulzhenko S.I. Legal problems of integrated development of territories (part 2) [Pravovye problemy kompleksnogo razvitiya territorij (chast’ 2) // Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie] // Management consulting. 2022. No. 2 (158). pp. 174-189.

59
FAMILY LAW  

MarinaV. Ulianova

Candidate of Law, Deputy Head of the Department of Civil Law, Associate Professor, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Russian State University of Justice (RSUJ)», Moscow.

E-mail: maryulianova14@gmail.com

Exercising family rights and fulfilling responsibilities: a systematic approach

Abstract

Subject/method The current state of society, the increasing number of disputes considered in courts from family relations, draw attention to the study of the essence of subjective family rights and to the problem of the implementation of family rights and the fulfillment of duties. The legal phenomenon is considered as a systemic one, prerequisites and measures aimed at the actual implementation of family rights and the fulfillment of responsibilities are identified.

Goal/objectives To comprehend implementation as a legal system phenomenon, to identify its nature, prerequisites, to present each element of the system, its place and significance in the system.

Methodology. The research used methods of analysis and synthesis, argumentation and generalization, and a systematic approach to the study of legal phenomena. The research is based on the doctrinal works of scientists, norms of international acts and national regulations, and judicial practice.

Conclusions The exercise of family rights and the fulfillment of responsibilities are defined as a systemic phenomenon; system-forming elements are identified and structured. The theoretical results obtained can be used in a family law course and form the basis for the development of legal regulation.

Keywords: systematic approach, system-forming elements, implementation of family rights, fulfillment of duties, legal fact, legal capacity, rule of law, organizational and legal prerequisites.

References:

Kulakov (2011) – Kulakov V.V. Complex obligations in civil law [Slozhnyye obyazatel’stva v grazhdanskom prave]: dis. … Doctor of Law. Sci. M. -382s.

Vavilin (2016) – Vavilin E.V. Exercise and protection of civil rights [Osushchestvleniye i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav] – 2nd ed., revised. And additional – Statute, 2016. 416 p.

Tolstoy (1958) – Tolstoy Yu.K. On the theory of legal relations [K teorii pravootnosheniya]. L.: Publishing house Lenigr. Univ., 1959. -87 p.

Ozhegov (1987) – Ozhegov S.I. Dictionary of the Russian language [Slovar’ russkogo yazyka] / Ed. N.Yu. Shvedova. M.: Russian language, 1987. – 798 p.

Kosova (2005) – Kosova O.Yu. The right to maintenance: family law aspect[ Pravo na soderzhaniye: semeyno-pravovoy aspekt]. Irkutsk: Publishing house IPKPR GP RF, 2005. -253 p.

Halfina (1974) – Halfina R.O. General doctrine of legal relations[Obshcheye ucheniye o pravootnoshenii]. M.: Legal. lit., 1974. – 352 p.

Krasavchikov (2005) – Krasavchikov O.A. Civil organizational and legal relations [Grazhdanskiye organizatsionno-pravovyye otnosheniya] // Categories of science of civil law. Selected works: in 2 volumes. T. 1. M.: Statute, 2005. -494 p.

Arzamaskin (2016) – Arzamaskin A.N. Regulatory and legal support of the economic policy of the modern Russian state [Normativno-pravovoye obespecheniye ekonomicheskoy politiki sovremennogo rossiyskogo gosudarstva]: abstract. dis. …cand. legal Sci. Kazan, 2016. – 54 p.

Antokolskaya (2010) – Antokolskaya M.V. Family law [Semeynoye pravo]. -M.: textbook / M.V. Antokolskaya. – 3rd ed., revised. And additional –M.: 2010. 432 p.

Abramov (2005) – Abramov V.I. Children’s rights in Russia [Prava rebenka v Rossii] / Ed. N.I. Matuzova. Saratov: Publishing house of GOU VPO SGAP, 2005. 321 p.

Ioffe, Shargorodsky (1961) – Ioffe O.S., Shargorodsky M.D. Questions of legal theory[Voprosy teorii prava]. M., Goyurizdat, 1961. 381 p.

Ershov (2018) – Ershov V.V. Legal and individual regulation of public relations [Pravovoye i individual’noye regulirovaniye obshchestvennykh otnosheniy]: Monograph. –M.RGUP, 2018.628p.

Ioffe (2000) – Ioffe O.S. Selected works on civil law From the history of civil thought Civil legal relations Criticism of the theory of “economic law” [Izbrannyye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu Iz istorii tsivilisticheskoy mysli Grazhdanskoye pravootnosheniye Kritika teorii «khozyaystvennogo prava»]. – M., Statute. 2000. – 777 p.

Danilin, Reutov (1989) – Danilin V.I., Reutov S.I. Legal facts in Soviet family law[Yuridicheskiye fakty v sovetskom semeynom prave]. Sverdlovsk: Ural Publishing House. Univ., 1989. – 156 p.

Korkunov (1909) – Korkunov N.M. Lectures on the general theory of law[Lektsii po obshchey teorii prava ]. St. Petersburg, 1909, p. 119.

Kulakov (2021) – Kulakov V.V. Problems of the subject, method and objects of civil law [Problemy predmeta, metoda i ob”yektov grazhdanskogo prava]// Current problems of the science of civil law at the present stage: monograph / edited by. ed. V.V. Kulakova, M.V. Ulyanova. M.: Prospekt, 2021. 336 p.

Peturova (2019) – Peturova N.N. Legal regulation of guardianship and trusteeship of adults in Russia, France and Switzerland [Pravovoye regulirovaniye opeki i popechitel’stva v otnoshenii sovershennoletnikh lits v Rossii, Frantsii i Shveytsarii]: dis. …cand. legal Sci. M., 2019.

Tarusina (2009) – Tarusina N.N. Family law: essays from classics and modernity[Semeynoye pravo: ocherki iz klassiki i moderna]: monograph. Yaroslavl: YarSU Publishing House, 2009. – 616 p.

Chefranova (2007) – Chefranova E.A. Mechanism of family law regulation of property relations of spouses [Mekhanizm semejno-pravovogo regulirovaniya imushchestvennyh otnoshenij suprugov]: dis. … Doctor of Law. Nauk M. 2007. – 630 p.

Chashkova (2004) – Chashkova S.Yu. The system of contractual obligations in Russian family law [Sistema dogovornyh obyazatel’stv v rossijskom semejnom prave]: abstract. dis. …cand. legal Sci. M., 2004. -28 p.

Zvenigorodskaya (2011) – Zvenigorodskaya N.F. Contents of a family law contract: the problem of freedom of its formation [Soderzhaniye semeyno-pravovogo dogovora: problema svobody yego formirovaniya] // Family and housing law. 2011. No. 6. P. 8–11;

Nizamieva (2011) – Nizamieva O.N. Contractual regulation of family relations in ensuring the rights and interests of children [Dogovornoye regulirovaniye semeynykh otnosheniy v obespechenii prav i interesov detey] // Family law at the turn of the 20th–21st centuries: to the 20th anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: materials of the International. scientific-practical conf. / answer ed. HE. Nizamiev. M.: Statute, 2011;

Savelyev (2017) – Savelyev D.B. Agreements in the family sphere [Soglasheniya v semeynoy sfere]: a textbook. Moscow: Prospekt, 2017. 144 p.

Titarenko (2005) – Titarenko E.P. Concept and characteristics of agreements in family law [Ponyatiye i kharakteristika soglasheniy v semeynom prave] // Family and housing law. 2005. No. 2.

Ulianova (2021) – Ulianova M. V. Regulation of family relations [Regulirovaniye semeynykh otnosheniy] / M. V. Ulyanova // Current problems of the science of civil law at the present stage / edited by. ed. V. V. Kulakova, M. V. Ulyanova. – M.: Prospekt, 2021. -336 pp..

Nechaeva (2007) – Nechaeva A.M. Family law: current problems of theory and practice [Семейное право: актуальные проблемы теории и практики]. M.: Yurait-Izdat, 2007. -330 p.

Kulakov (2017) – Kulakov V.V. Principles of family law [Printsipy semeynogo prava]/ V.V. Kulakov // Current problems of Russian law. 2017. No. 5(78). pp. 16-20.

Chashkova (2010) – Chashkova S.Yu. Application of the categories “conscientiousness” and “reasonableness” in regulating property relations of spouses [Primeneniye kategoriy «dobrosovestnost’» i «razumnost’» pri regulirovanii imushchestvennykh otnosheniy suprugov]// Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2010. No. 9. P. 47–53;

Yakushev (2017) – Yakushev P.A. The institution of marriage: traditional and legal regulation in Russia and European countries [Institut braka: traditsionnoye i pravovoye regulirovaniye v Rossii i stranakh Yevropy]. Vladimir: Atlas, 2017. -118 p.

30 Bagrova (2019) – Bagrova N.V. Individual legal regulation of property relations of spouses [Individual’noye pravovoye regulirovaniye imushchestvennykh otnosheniy suprugov]. Tomsk, 2019. -605 p.

Nechaeva (1980) – Nechaeva A.M. Family and law. Legal regulation of non-property marriage and family relations [Sem’ya i zakon. Pravovoye regulirovaniye neimushchestvennykh brachno-semeynykh otnosheniy]. M.: Publishing house Nauka. 1980. -128s.

Vorozheikin (1972) – Vorozheikin E.M. Family legal relations in the USSR [Semeynyye pravootnosheniya v SSSR] – M.: Legal literature, 1972. 336 p.

Alekseev (1966) – Alekseev S.S. The mechanism of legal regulation in a socialist state [Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya v sotsialisticheskom gosudarstve]. M.: Legal lit. 1966. M. -187 p.

Bratus (1950) – Bratus S.N. Course of Soviet civil law. “Subjects of civil law” [Kurs sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava. «Sub”yekty grazhdanskogo prava»] M.: Legal. lit. 1950. -368 p.

Krasavchikov (2005) – Krasavchikov O.A. Categories of the science of civil law. Selected works [Kategorii nauki grazhdanskogo prava]: In 2 vols. T.1M. 2005. Civil organizational and legal relations. Statute.-492 p.

Fleishitz (1960) – Fleishitz E.A. Correlation of legal capacity and subjective rights[Sootnosheniye pravosposobnosti i sub”yektivnykh prav] // Questions of the general theory of Soviet law. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1960. P. 255-283/

Matuzov (1966) – Matuzov N.I. Subjective rights of citizens of the USSR [Sub”yektivnyye prava grazhdan SSSR]. – Saratov. Volga region book publishing house 1966. 190 p.

Letova (2017) – Letova N.V. Family status of the child: problems of theory and practice [Semeynyy status rebenka: problemy teorii i praktiki]: monograph. M. 2017. -144 p.

Yampolskaya (1966) – Yampolskaya T.O. On the theory of administrative contract [O teorii administrativnogo dogovora] // Soviet state and law. 1966. No. 10. pp. 132–136.

Popova (2015) – Popova R.V. Retrospective approach to the analysis of social ideas about family and marriage [Retrospektivnyy podkhod v analize sotsial’nykh predstavleniy o sem’ye i brake] // Problem field of modern family: materials of the I International. scientific-practical conf. MGGU im. M.A. Sholokhov, June 18–19, 2015 (Moscow) / rep. ed. M.I. Rosenova, V.V. Ermolaev, E.V. Likhacheva. M.: Diona, 2015. -250 pp.

Yakovlev (2015) – Yakovlev V.A. Personal characteristics of spouses influencing the choice of the form of marital relations in modern marriage [Lichnostnyye osobennosti suprugov, vliyayushchiye na vybor formy supruzheskikh otnosheniy v sovremennom brake] // Problem field of the modern family: materials of the I International. scientific-practical conf. MGGU im. M.A. Sholokhov, June 18–19, 2015 (Moscow) / rep. ed. M.I. Rosenova, V.V. Ermolaev, E.V. Likhacheva. M.: Diona, 2015. -250 pp.

Salishcheva (2015) – Salishcheva I.E. The problem of marital satisfaction: results of modern research over the last five years (2011–2015) [Problema udovletvorennosti brakom: rezul’taty sovremennykh issledovaniy za posledneye pyatiletiye (2011–2015 gg.)] // Problem field of the modern family: materials of the I International. scientific-practical conf. MGGU im. M.A. Sholokhov, June 18–19, 2015 (Moscow) / rep. ed. M.I. Rosenova, V.V. Ermolaev, E.V. Likhacheva. M.: Diona, 2015. -250 pp.

Borshchevsky, Sosna (2012) – Borshevsky A.P., Sosna A.B. Current aspects of youth rights: the right to education [Aktual’nyye aspekty prav molodezhi: pravo na obrazovaniye] // Issues of juvenile justice. 2012. No. 1 P. 25–26.

Stulnikova (2008) – Stulnikova O.V. The constitutional right of citizens to education and problems of its implementation in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation [Konstitutsionnoye pravo grazhdan na obrazovaniye i problemy yego realizatsii v sub”yektakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii]: dis. …cand. legal Sci. Saratov, 2008. 225 p.

76
HOUSING LAW  

Anna R. Purge

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law Disciplines of the Institute of Law of Vladivostok State University, Vladivostok.

E-mail: a.purge@mail.ru

Problems of development of the legal regime of specialized residential premises as a housing stock of public legal relations

Annotation

Subject/topic The subject of the study was housing relations arising in connection with the provision of residential premises to a citizen necessary for him to perform his labor or public service functions, as well as for living in circumstances of insufficient social security (social security) for self-purchase of housing. The objects of the presented research are statistical and factual data, current housing legislation and legislation of previous years, judicial practice, scientific research on issues in the field of housing law.

Goals/objectives The purpose of the formation of a specialized housing stock determines its main legal feature: the residential premises of this fund cannot be alienated, no administrative transactions can be made with them, except for transactions of their transfer to use for their intended purpose on the basis of a lease agreement.

Methodology The methodology of the presented research consists of both general scientific methods, primarily dialectical, axiological and formal–logical, as well as special methods of sociological knowledge of law, historical and legal, methods of interpretation (linguistic), the method of comparative analysis and the method of forecasting.

Conclusion The Constitution of Russia does not restrict the Russian Federation in choosing forms and ways to assist citizens in exercising their right to housing. Therefore, all these forms naturally, like the Russian legal system itself, were divided into two spheres: the sphere of activity of private individuals and the sphere of activity of the state. And if dwellings in the private sphere of relations turned out to be the object of free market relations, then in the sphere of state activity, dwellings began to act as a means of solving its tasks and performing its public functions. This circumstance allowed the legislator to form a special fund of residential premises under a special legal regime, defined as specialized residential premises. The study allows us to conclude that, based on the objectives of the legal regime of specialized residential premises, their range could be expanded at the expense of apartments that are provided to persons in need of better housing conditions.

Keywords: residential premises, social hiring, specialized residential premises, office premises, dormitories, maneuverable housing stock, internally displaced persons, kid, refugees, state.

References:

Vasiliev (2006) – Vasiliev P.P. Legal regulation of relations on the provision and use of office premises under the housing legislation of the Russian Federation: diss. … cand. jurid. sciences. [Pravovoe regulirovanie otnoshenij po predostavleniyu i pol’zovaniyu sluzhebnymi zhilymi pomeshcheniyami po zhilishchnomu zakonodatel’stvu RF] Belgorod, 161.

Gorelikov (2005) – Gorelikov V.V. Go, citizens, serve – you will live in apartments! (On the obligation to provide military personnel with office living quarters in the form of a separate apartment). [Idite, grazhdane, sluzhit’ – budete v kvartirah zhit’! (Ob obyazannosti predostavleniya voennosluzhashchim sluzhebnyh zhilyh pomeshchenij v vide otdel’noj kvartiry)] Law in the Armed Forces, 2005, 10, 31-35.

Skripka (2023) – Skripka A. The issue of housing to Belgorod residents to replace the lost one has become overgrown with problems. [Vydacha belgorodcam zhil’ya vzamen utrachennogo obrosla problemami]  Rossiyskaya gazeta, 04/18/2023, 5.

Dmitrieva (2023) – Dmitrieva I. In the LPR, they will create a maneuverable housing fund for the issuance of housing to Belgorod residents in place of the lost one has become overgrown with problems. [V LNR sozdadut manevrennyj zhilishchnyj fond dlya Vydacha belgorodcam zhil’ya vzamen utrachennogo obrosla problemami] Rossiyskaya gazeta, 04/18/2023, 5.

Formakidov (2022) – Formakidov D.A. Contractual regulation of housing relations in the Russian Federation [Dogovornoe regulirovanie zhilishchnyh otnoshenij v Rossijskoj Federacii]: dis. … doct. Jurid. Sciences. Moscow, 582.

Gurbanova (2009) – Gurbanova E.V. Lease agreement for residential premises of specialized housing stock [Dogovor najma zhilogo pomeshcheniya specializirovannogo zhilishchnogo fonda]: dis. …. cand. Jurid. Sciences. Moscow, 203.

Shipunova (2008) – Shipunova E.A. Housing legal relationship for the hiring of specialized residential premises [ZHilishchnoe pravootnoshenie po najmu specializirovannogo zhilogo pomeshcheniya]: dis. … cand. Jurid. sciences. Moscow, 254.

Ivanov (2015) – Ivanov A. Real estate issues in the new Housing Code of the Russian Federation. [Voprosy nedvizhimosti v novom ZHilishchnom kodekse RF] Economy and law, 2015, 6, 92-101.

Shipunova (2019) – Shipunova E. Specialized housing stock: there are more questions than answers. [Specializirovannyj zhilishchnyj fond: voprosov bol’she, chem otvetov] Housing law, 2019, 5, 41.

98
YOUNG SCIENTIST’S TRIBUNE  

Stepan B. Abramov

Postgraduate student of the Department of Copyright, Related Rights and Private Law Disciplines, Moscow, Russia.

Email: stepan.abramov@list.ru

Forms of guilt in connection to causing of moral damage due to violation of intellectual rights

Annotation

Subject/topic. This article identifies and analyzes the forms and degrees of guilt characteristic for causing moral damage due to the violation of intellectual rights. To illustrate the author’s conclusions, examples of specific violations of intellectual property rights are given.

Goals/objectives. The objective of this work is to determine the possibility and features of applying various forms and degrees of guilt to cases of causing moral harm by violation of intellectual property rights. In addition, the article will analyze the relationship between the forms and degrees of guilt related to the violation of intellectual rights as such, on the one hand, and to the infliction of moral harm by such a violation, on the other.

Methodology. The following methods were used in the publication: analysis, synthesis, comparison, formally – legal method. Analytical work has been carried out to study regulatory legal acts and civil doctrine.

Conclusions. It has been established that when intellectual rights are violated, moral damage is caused, as a rule, by a simple negligence, and less often by gross negligence. The concept of intentional harm is unlikely to apply to such violations. At the same time, the degree of guilt related to the violation of intellectual rights as such may differ from the degree of guilt corresponding to causing moral harm.

Keywords: intellectual property, harm, moral harm, forms of guilt, degrees of guilt, artificial intelligence.

References:

Erdelevskii (2000) – Erdelevskii A.M. Problems of compensation for suffering in Russian and foreign law: PhD dissertation: 12.00.03 [Problemy kompensacii za prichinenie stradanij v rossijskom i zarubezhnom prave] / A.M. Erdelevskii. – Moscow, 2000. 348 p.

Tabunshchikov (2005) – Tabunshchikov A.T. Compensation of moral damage in the civil legislation of the Russian Federation: PhD dissertation: 12.00.03 [Kompensatsiia moral’nogo vreda v grazhdanskom zakonodatel’stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii]/ A.T. Tabushchnikov. – Belgorod, 2005. 150 p.

Veshkurtseva (2015) – Veshkurtseva Z.V. Actual problems of moral damage compensation for violation of moral rights in the Internet and other informational networks: PhD dissertation: 12.00.03 [Aktual’nye problemy kompensatsii moral’nogo vreda pri narushenii lichnykh neimushchestvennykh prav v seti internet i drugikh informatsionno-kommunikatsionnykh setiakh]/ Z.V. Veshkurtseva. – Moskva, 2015. 256 p.

Dashko (2006) – Dashko O.V. Moral damage and features of its compensation for infringement of copyright and related rights: PhD dissertation: 12.00.03 [Moral’nyi vred i osobennosti ego kompensatsii za narushenie avtorskikh i smezhnykh prav]/ O.V. Dashko. – Moskva, 2006. 207 p.

Mikhno (1998) – Mikhno E.A. Compensation of moral damage in non-contractual obligations: PhD dissertation: 12.00.03 [Kompensatsiia moral’nogo vreda vo vnedogovornykh obiazatel’stvakh]/ E.A. Mikhno. – SPb., 1998. 163 p.

Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 15 noiabria 2022 g. № 33 «O praktike primeneniia sudami norm o kompensatsii moral’nogo vreda» [Elektronnyi resurs] SPS Konsul’tant plius URL: https://www.consultant.ru/ document/cons_doc_LAW_431485/ (data obrashcheniia 11.06.2024).

Asmandijarov (2017) – Asmandiiarov V.M. Civil law, general part, text book [Grazhdanskoe pravo. obshchaia chast’: uchebnoe posobie]/ V.M. Asmandiiarov, M.M. Popovich; Feder. sluzhba ispoln. nakazanii, Vologod. in-t prava i ekonomiki., Vologda., 2017. p. 132.

Oorzhak (2023) – Oorzhak A.V. Forms of guilt in civil law [Formy viny v grazhdanskom prave]// Vestnik magistratury. 2023. № 1-2 (136). p. 132.

110

Anastasia O. Kulazhina

MA student at the Faculty of Law of the Financial University under thе Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.

E-mail: anastasiakulazhina@yandex.ru

The international legal framework for cooperation between the Russian Federation and international economic organizations

Annotation

Subject/topic The article examines the international legal foundations of cooperation between the Russian Federation and international economic organizations, identifies promising areas for the development of international cooperation within the framework of international economic organizations, taking into account the sanctions reality. The object of the study is the social relations arising from the cooperation of the Russian Federation with international economic organizations. The subject of the research is the principles and norms of international law, national law governing the cooperation of the Russian Federation with international economic organizations, participation in these organizations, as well as the works of domestic and foreign scientists.

Goals/objectives The purpose of the study is to consider the international legal regulation of cooperation between the Russian Federation and international economic organizations. To achieve this goal, the following tasks were set: to identify the development of relations between Russia and member states of international economic organizations on the example of the CIS, to study and analyze the controversial provisions of the CIS Charter on membership in the Commonwealth, to study the status of the Russian Federation as the legal successor of the USSR, to consider the impact of Russia’s cooperation with these international economic organizations on the national economy.

Methodology Such general scientific methods as historical, logical method, generalization method, deduction and induction were used.

Conclusion The article provides an analysis of the international legal framework for cooperation between the Russian Federation and international economic organizations. It is concluded that the Russian Federation is the legal successor of the USSR. The effectiveness of international cooperation within the CIS is assessed. Problems with international cooperation during the period of sanctions have been identified. It is concluded that the Russian Federation is the legal successor of the USSR.

Keywords: international economic organizations, succession, sanctions, CIS.

References:

Kosilkin (2003) – Kosilkin S.V. The legal status of integration associations of the CIS member states: dissertation … Candidate of Law Sciences: 12.00.10. – M. [Pravovoj status integracionnyh ob”edinenij gosudarstv-uchastnikov SNG: dissertaciya … kandidata yuridicheskih nauk: 12.00.10. – M.]. 2003. — 222 p.

Kulikov (2000) – Kulikov A.V. Methods of decision-making in international organizations and at international conferences // Journal of International Law. [Metody prinyatiya reshenij v mezhdunarodnyh organizaciyah i na mezhdunarodnyh konferenciyah // ZHurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava]. 2000. № 3(39). P. 185-219.

Kalmykov (2003) – Kalmykov Y.H. Twists of fate: Memories. Articles. Interview – Moscow: Statute. [Povoroty sud’by: Vospominaniya. Stat’i. Interv’yu – M.: Statut]. 2003. — 366 p.

Shumsky (2012) – Shumsky N.N. Features of the organizational and legal system of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the main directions of its improvement// State and law. [Osobennosti organizacionno-pravovoj sistemy Sodruzhestva Nezavisimyh Gosudarstv i osnovnye napravleniya ee sovershenstvovaniya// Gosudarstvo i pravo]. 2012. №. 8. P. 87-91.

Lenchuk (2022) – Lenchuk E.B. Import substitution in the Union State: directions of effective cooperation between Russia and Belarus // RSM. [Importozameshchenie v Soyuznom gosudarstve: napravleniya effektivnogo vzaimodejstviya Rossii i Belarusi // RSM]. 2022. № 4 (117). P. 6-22.

Zheliba (2021) – Zheliba B.N. The impact of Western sanctions on the economy of Belarus // Strategies for the development of the economy of Belarus: challenges, implementation tools and prospects. The National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Institute of Economics of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Minsk: Law and Economics. [Vliyanie sankcij Zapada na ekonomiku Belarusi // Strategii razvitiya ekonomiki Belarusi: vyzovy, instrumenty realizacii i perspektivy. Nacional’naya akademiya nauk Belarusi. Institut ekonomiki NAN Belarusi. Minsk: Pravo i ekonomika]. 2021. — 640 p.

Shirov (2022) – Shirov A., Gusev M. Import substitution: strategy and tactics of success // Expert. [Importozameshchenie: strategiya i taktika uspekha // Ekspert]. 2022. № 27. P. 56-59.

Malyshev (2020) – Malyshev D.V. The Commonwealth of Independent States: spatial and organizational dynamics. Analysis and forecast. Journal of IMEMO RAS. [Sodruzhestvo Nezavisimyh Gosudarstv: prostranstvenno-organizacionnaya dinamika. Analiz i prognoz. ZHurnal IMEMO RAN]. 2019. № 3.  P. 23-36.

Tzu (2018) – Wu Tzu, Sazonov S.L. The Central Asian region as the most important link in infrastructural cooperation of Greater Eurasia-2030 // Greater Eurasia: development, security, cooperation. [Region Central’noj Azii kak vazhnejshee zveno infrastrukturnogo sotrudnichestva bol’shoj evrazii-2030 // Bol’shaya Evraziya: razvitie, bezopasnost’, sotrudnichestvo]. 2018. № 1-1. P. 344-348.

Pozdnyakova (2020) – Pozdnyakova T.M. Integration processes in the post-Soviet space // Bulletin of the PSU. Sholom Aleichem. [Integracionnye processy na postsovetskom prostranstve // Vestnik PGU im. SHolom-Alejhema]. 2020. № 3 (40). P. 66-77.

Svistunova (2021) – Svistunova L.Yu., Brezhneva P.A. Strategic directions of economic cooperation of the CIS member states at the present stage // Leningrad Law Journal. [Strategicheskie napravleniya ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva gosudarstv – uchastnikov SNG na sovremennom etape // Leningradskij yuridicheskij zhurnal]. 2021. № 2 (64). P. 157-167.

117